From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/1] SCSI: hosts: update to use ida_simple for host_no
 management
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:45:27 -0800
Message-ID: <568ACBD7.9010504@suse.com>
References: <cover.1444241058.git.lduncan@suse.com>
 <f89fe3933ae899dc01f2eddd2a0cefac3383cf3c.1444241058.git.lduncan@suse.com>
 <1444830904.2220.28.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <561EA018.7020700@suse.com>
 <1444848835.2220.50.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <5644BEE1.3010208@suse.com>
 <yq1ziyhy38c.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net> <5649C79E.9070603@suse.de>
 <564A4EDC.8060805@suse.com> <yq1d1v8tdr3.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
 <5669F31C.2010409@suse.com> <1449847911.4067.200.camel@localhost.localdomain>
 <566DC3F0.6050206@suse.com> <1450105632.4091.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
 <566EE055.9050708@suse.de> <yq1r3iowk5j.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
 <56730BEB.2050007@suse.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <56730BEB.2050007@suse.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: emilne@redhat.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org

On 12/17/2015 11:24 AM, Lee Duncan wrote:
> On 12/14/2015 05:55 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> writes:
>>
>>>> I'm not opposed to having the module option if others (Martin?) feel
>>>> they need it, but generally I think it's better to keep things as
>>>> simple as possible.  So, unless there are strong objections, I would
>>>> say no.
>>
>> Hannes> Agreeing with Ewan here.
>>
>> Hannes> I guess it's up to you to tell us whether you absolutely need a
>> Hannes> module parameter ...
>>
>> Still not a big ida fan but since the most people seem to be in favor of
>> this I guess I'll have to bite the bullet.
>>
>> I don't see much value in the module parameter since it will require
>> customers to tweak their configs and reproduce. Not worth the hassle.
>>
> 
> Thank you Martin. I'll look at further cleaning up the host module, but
> I think this still much better than leaving the code as is.
> 

James:

Do you need me to resubmit this patch now that it's accepted?
-- 
Lee Duncan