* 4.4 regression/bisected: error message due to "block/sd: Fix device-imposed transfer length limits"
@ 2016-01-13 13:15 Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-13 13:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2016-01-13 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin K. Petersen; +Cc: linux-block, linux-scsi, dm-devel
Martin,
with 4.4 I get messages like
device-mapper: table: 253:4: adding target device sdq caused an alignment inconsistency: physical_block_size=4096, logical_block_size=512, alignment_offset=0, start=0
when I use device mapper multipath on a scsi disk on a FlashSystem-9840 scsi disk.
The disk has a quite interesting layout (physical block size=4k, logical=512)
blockdev --getbsz /dev/sdq
4096
blockdev --getss /dev/sdq
512
blockdev --getpbsz /dev/sdq
4096
the disks seems to work ok, though.
Any ideas?
Christian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 4.4 regression/bisected: error message due to "block/sd: Fix device-imposed transfer length limits"
2016-01-13 13:15 4.4 regression/bisected: error message due to "block/sd: Fix device-imposed transfer length limits" Christian Borntraeger
@ 2016-01-13 13:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-01-13 13:50 ` Christian Borntraeger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2016-01-13 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Borntraeger
Cc: Martin K. Petersen, linux-block, linux-scsi, dm-devel
>>>>> "Christian" == Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> writes:
Christian> device-mapper: table: 253:4: adding target device sdq caused
Christian> an alignment inconsistency: physical_block_size=4096,
Christian> logical_block_size=512, alignment_offset=0, start=0
Odd.
Please provide the output of:
# sg_readcap -l /dev/sdN
# sg_vpd -p bl /dev/sdN
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 4.4 regression/bisected: error message due to "block/sd: Fix device-imposed transfer length limits"
2016-01-13 13:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
@ 2016-01-13 13:50 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-15 14:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2016-01-13 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin K. Petersen; +Cc: linux-block, linux-scsi, dm-devel
On 01/13/2016 02:22 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>> "Christian" == Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> writes:
>
> Christian> device-mapper: table: 253:4: adding target device sdq caused
> Christian> an alignment inconsistency: physical_block_size=4096,
> Christian> logical_block_size=512, alignment_offset=0, start=0
>
> Odd.
>
> Please provide the output of:
>
> # sg_readcap -l /dev/sdN
> # sg_vpd -p bl /dev/sdN
>
>From a different system with a different disk, but the same storage server and the same error.
sg_vpd -p bl /dev/sdu
Block limits VPD page (SBC):
Write same no zero (WSNZ): 1
Maximum compare and write length: 0 blocks
Optimal transfer length granularity: 128 blocks
Maximum transfer length: 0 blocks
Optimal transfer length: 1024 blocks
Maximum prefetch length: 0 blocks
Maximum unmap LBA count: 0
Maximum unmap block descriptor count: 0
Optimal unmap granularity: 0
Unmap granularity alignment valid: 0
Unmap granularity alignment: 0
Maximum write same length: 0x0 blocks
sg_readcap -l /dev/sdu
Read Capacity results:
Protection: prot_en=0, p_type=0, p_i_exponent=0
Logical block provisioning: lbpme=0, lbprz=0
Last logical block address=4294967295 (0xffffffff), Number of logical blocks=4294967296
Logical block length=512 bytes
Logical blocks per physical block exponent=3
Lowest aligned logical block address=0
Hence:
Device size: 2199023255552 bytes, 2097152.0 MiB, 2199.02 GB
This is part of a big multipath setup, if that makes a difference.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 4.4 regression/bisected: error message due to "block/sd: Fix device-imposed transfer length limits"
2016-01-13 13:50 ` Christian Borntraeger
@ 2016-01-15 14:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-15 14:52 ` Martin K. Petersen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2016-01-15 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin K. Petersen; +Cc: linux-block, linux-scsi, dm-devel, Steffen Maier
On 01/13/2016 02:50 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 02:22 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>>> "Christian" == Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> writes:
Martin,
does the data make any sense to you?
>>
>> Christian> device-mapper: table: 253:4: adding target device sdq caused
>> Christian> an alignment inconsistency: physical_block_size=4096,
>> Christian> logical_block_size=512, alignment_offset=0, start=0
>>
>> Odd.
>>
>> Please provide the output of:
>>
>> # sg_readcap -l /dev/sdN
>> # sg_vpd -p bl /dev/sdN
>>
>
> From a different system with a different disk, but the same storage server and the same error.
>
> sg_vpd -p bl /dev/sdu
> Block limits VPD page (SBC):
> Write same no zero (WSNZ): 1
> Maximum compare and write length: 0 blocks
> Optimal transfer length granularity: 128 blocks
> Maximum transfer length: 0 blocks
> Optimal transfer length: 1024 blocks
> Maximum prefetch length: 0 blocks
> Maximum unmap LBA count: 0
> Maximum unmap block descriptor count: 0
> Optimal unmap granularity: 0
> Unmap granularity alignment valid: 0
> Unmap granularity alignment: 0
> Maximum write same length: 0x0 blocks
> sg_readcap -l /dev/sdu
> Read Capacity results:
> Protection: prot_en=0, p_type=0, p_i_exponent=0
> Logical block provisioning: lbpme=0, lbprz=0
> Last logical block address=4294967295 (0xffffffff), Number of logical blocks=4294967296
> Logical block length=512 bytes
> Logical blocks per physical block exponent=3
> Lowest aligned logical block address=0
> Hence:
> Device size: 2199023255552 bytes, 2097152.0 MiB, 2199.02 GB
>
> This is part of a big multipath setup, if that makes a difference.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 4.4 regression/bisected: error message due to "block/sd: Fix device-imposed transfer length limits"
2016-01-15 14:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
@ 2016-01-15 14:52 ` Martin K. Petersen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2016-01-15 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Borntraeger
Cc: Martin K. Petersen, linux-block, linux-scsi, dm-devel,
Steffen Maier
>>>>> "Christian" == Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> writes:
Christian> does the data make any sense to you?
I will try to reproduce with scsi_debug and your parameters. I'll get to
it later today.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-01-15 14:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-01-13 13:15 4.4 regression/bisected: error message due to "block/sd: Fix device-imposed transfer length limits" Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-13 13:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-01-13 13:50 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-15 14:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-15 14:52 ` Martin K. Petersen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox