From: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SCSI][REGRESSION][BISECTED] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:11:03 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56979.43325.qm@web110612.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> (raw)
> From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
>
> Can you try this patch ... it was something I meant to get into 2.6.29
> but forgot about. The key problem that you seem to be hitting is that
> the requeue evades the timeout check. Moving the timeout check to block
> should fix that.
Even by itself this patch works although the behaviour is now different
to that of 2.6.28. Whereas in 2.6.28 it would timeout very quickly
(after about 1 or 2 seconds) it now times out after 30 seconds
(initially I hadn't realised that it would be so much longer). The
other difference is that the failure becomes cached - trying to reread
the same area using dd instantly fails from now on without any more disk
IO/kernel error messages until echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches is
issued. Before it would always go straight to the disk for the unread
section and the kernel spew would be repeated before the failure.
I guess if this is new intended behaviour then all is well - it's just
different and slower/faster :)
Tested-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
next reply other threads:[~2009-02-19 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-19 21:11 Sitsofe Wheeler [this message]
2009-02-19 21:48 ` [SCSI][REGRESSION][BISECTED] Disk errors loop forever in 2.6.29 James Bottomley
2009-02-20 0:54 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0902191002160.3012-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
2009-02-19 16:52 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-02-19 18:41 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56979.43325.qm@web110612.mail.gq1.yahoo.com \
--to=sitsofe@yahoo.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox