linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 20/23] scsi: Add 'access_state' attribute
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:03:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C81DB5.7070102@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56C7688A.2050608@sandisk.com>

On 02/19/2016 08:10 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 02/19/2016 12:17 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> +static ssize_t
>> +sdev_show_access_state(struct device *dev,
>> +		       struct device_attribute *attr,
>> +		       char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
>> +	unsigned char access_state;
>> +	const char *access_state_name;
>> +	bool pref = false;
>> +
>> +	if (!sdev->handler)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	if (sdev->access_state & SCSI_ACCESS_STATE_PREFERRED)
>> +		pref = true;
>> +
>> +	access_state = (sdev->access_state & SCSI_ACCESS_STATE_MASK);
>> +	access_state_name = scsi_access_state_name(access_state);
>> +
>> +	return snprintf(buf, 32, "%s%s\n",
>> +			access_state_name ? access_state_name : "unknown",
>> +			pref ? " preferred" : "");
>> +}
>
> Hello Hannes,
>
> What is inelegant about the above approach is that the access_state attribute
> is added to all SCSI devices, whether or not a device handler has been attached,
> and that reading that attribute doesn't fail for devices to which another handler
> than the ALUA handler has been attached. How about the patch below, which moves
> the access_state show handler to the scsi_dh_alua.c source file, where it belongs?
>
Actually, this was my first approach, but hch suggested moving it to
the generic code :-(

Also when using your suggestion the 'access_state' attribute will only 
be created _after_ the 'ADD' uevent, making it impossible to use it from 
udev events.

However, I'm currently working on using the 'is_visible' callback for 
SCSI sysfs attributes for this; in theory it should be possible to
use 'sysfs_update_groups()' during scsi_add_lun() to blank out the
unsupported attributes.

Which I think might be the best approach here.

But probably not for this patch series; I'd rather have the alua update 
in first as it took long enough.

If you're absolutely against it we can drop the 'access_state' patches
(ie patch 20-22) and have them folded into a separate patchset.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-20  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-19  8:16 [PATCHv8 00/23] ALUA device handler update, part II Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:16 ` [PATCHv8 01/23] scsi_dh_alua: Pass buffer as function argument Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:16 ` [PATCHv8 02/23] scsi_dh_alua: separate out alua_stpg() Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 03/23] scsi_dh_alua: Make stpg synchronous Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 04/23] scsi_dh_alua: call alua_rtpg() if stpg fails Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 05/23] scsi_dh_alua: switch to scsi_execute_req_flags() Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 06/23] scsi_dh_alua: allocate RTPG buffer separately Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 07/23] scsi_dh_alua: Use separate alua_port_group structure Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 08/23] scsi_dh_alua: use unique device id Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 09/23] scsi_dh_alua: simplify alua_initialize() Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 10/23] revert commit a8e5a2d593cb ("[SCSI] scsi_dh_alua: ALUA handler attach should succeed while TPG is transitioning") Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 11/23] scsi_dh_alua: move optimize_stpg evaluation Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 12/23] scsi_dh_alua: remove 'rel_port' from alua_dh_data structure Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 13/23] scsi_dh_alua: Use workqueue for RTPG Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 14/23] scsi_dh_alua: Allow workqueue to run synchronously Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 15/23] scsi_dh_alua: Add new blacklist flag 'BLIST_SYNC_ALUA' Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 16/23] scsi_dh_alua: Recheck state on unit attention Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 17/23] scsi_dh_alua: update all port states Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 18/23] scsi_dh_alua: Send TEST UNIT READY to poll for transitioning Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 19/23] scsi_dh: add 'rescan' callback Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 20/23] scsi: Add 'access_state' attribute Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19 19:10   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-02-20  8:03     ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2016-02-20 15:16       ` Bart Van Assche
2016-02-21  8:27         ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-22  3:05           ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-02-22  4:45           ` Bart Van Assche
2016-02-22  6:59             ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-22 15:34               ` Bart Van Assche
2016-02-23 10:27                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-23 14:12                   ` Ewan Milne
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 21/23] scsi_dh_alua: use common definitions for ALUA state Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 22/23] scsi_dh_alua: update 'access_state' field Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-19  8:17 ` [PATCHv8 23/23] scsi_dh_alua: Update version to 2.0 Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-24  1:50 ` [PATCHv8 00/23] ALUA device handler update, part II Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56C81DB5.7070102@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=emilne@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).