linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@windriver.com>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: QoS for iSCSI target?
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 17:01:52 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5702F260.5010404@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459808966.10124.11.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com>

On 04/04/2016 04:29 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 09:20 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
>> On 04/02/2016 07:15 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 12:35 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
>>
>>>>>> On a slightly different note, is there any way to throttle or limit the overall
>>>>>> bandwidth consumed by the iSCSI target in the kernel?  I'd like to ensure that
>>>>>> the iSCSI traffic doesn't completely swamp the host accesses to the same block
>>>>>> device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suppose I could do networking-based traffic shaping, but are there any
>>>>>> controls in the block IO subsystem?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On a individual block_device backend basis, block cgroups is the
>>>>> preferred method for doing this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that any rate limiting imposed by block cgroups is subject to the
>>>>> current se_node_acl->queue_depth enforced across all LUNs within a given
>>>>> iscsi session.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How would I use cgroups with the kernel iSCSI target?  Is there a set of kernel
>>>> threads dedicated to the iSCSI target that I can assign to a particular group?
>>>>
>>>
>>> block cgroups can set I/O throttling (bandwidth + IOPs) limits for any
>>> normal struct block_device.
>>>
>>> These values are configured via blkio.throttle.* resource class, and the
>>> limits are imposed independently of the block_device's association with
>>> target_core_mod backend driver export.  Namely:
>>>
>>>       blkio.throttle.write_iops_device
>>>       blkio.throttle.read_iops_device
>>>       blkio.throttle.write_bps_device
>>>       blkio.throttle.read_bdp_device
>>>
>>> Some examples using these values, plus more blkio.* info is here:
>>> http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/cgroups_0.pdf.
>>>
>>
>> I understand how to set up the cgroups, but don't I need to ensure that the IO
>> operations happen in the context of a particular cgroup?  If so, how do I ensure
>> that the in-kernel iSCSI target traffic happens in the context of the specified
>> group?  Are there a set of kernel threads dedicated to processing iSCSI requests?
>>
>
> block cgroups does I/O ratelimiting at struct block_device level.
>
> Eg: The process cgroup (which AFAICT is what your thinking about) is
> separate from block cgroups, and doesn't need to be explicitly enabled
> in order for block cgroup to function.
>

I'm still confused.

I'm not trying to globally throttle IO on a particular block device.  I'm trying 
to control how much IO the iSCSI target in the kernel is allowed to drive on a 
particular block device.

The goal is to ensure that the iSCSI target does not consume all of the 
available bandwidth for a particular block device.  I want to ensure that some 
of the bandwidth for that device is available to other processes on the host 
(for management purposes) rather than being consumed by a greedy iSCSI initiator.

In an ideal world I would like a set of rules that say things like:
1) if there is contention, ensure that the host is guaranteed X percent of the 
available /dev/sdb IOPS
2) if there is contention, do not allow the iSCSI target traffic to consume more 
than Y percent of /dev/sdb's write traffic

Chris

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-04 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-10 22:24 QoS for iSCSI target? Chris Friesen
2016-03-11  7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-11  7:45   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2016-03-16 16:48     ` Chris Friesen
2016-03-31  7:05       ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2016-04-01 18:35         ` Chris Friesen
2016-04-03  1:15           ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2016-04-04 15:20             ` Chris Friesen
2016-04-04 22:29               ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2016-04-04 23:01                 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2016-04-05  0:25                   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2016-04-05 14:22                     ` Chris Friesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5702F260.5010404@windriver.com \
    --to=chris.friesen@windriver.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).