Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michel Meyers <steltek@tcnnet.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: add Synology DSM 6.0 and higher to 1024 sector blacklist
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:46:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <571741F5.7060305@tcnnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq137qqzl6f.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>

On 2016-04-12 21:22, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>>> Mike: Any preference?
> 
> Mike> I think quirking SYNOLOGY is best. It will be the safest route and
> Mike> work for all devices.
> 
> Michel: Please spin a new version of the patch.

Apologies for not getting back earlier. SYNOLOGY have released a new
version of their OS indicating that they have worked to fix the iSCSI
problem (and another one to actually make that update installable):

https://www.synology.com/en-global/releaseNote/RS10613xs+
- "Fixed multiple issues that might cause iSCSI service to hang under
heavy loading and performing Vmware VAAI commands."
- "Fixed an issue where DSM 6.0-7321 Update 1 could not be normally
installed with Auto-Update."

(They have not updated my support ticket on this case thus far.)

Both my SYNOLOGY appliances now seem to show correct vpd data when queried:

root@server:/# sg_vpd -p bl /dev/sdb
Block limits VPD page (SBC):
  Write same non-zero (WSNZ): 1
  Maximum compare and write length: 1 blocks
  Optimal transfer length granularity: 128 blocks
  Maximum transfer length: 8192 blocks
  Optimal transfer length: 1152 blocks
  Maximum prefetch length: 0 blocks

root@server:/# sg_vpd -p bl /dev/sdd
Block limits VPD page (SBC):
  Write same non-zero (WSNZ): 1
  Maximum compare and write length: 1 blocks
  Optimal transfer length granularity: 128 blocks
  Maximum transfer length: 8192 blocks
  Optimal transfer length: 512 blocks
  Maximum prefetch length: 0 blocks

I am currently running tests with an unmodified Debian 4.4.0-1-amd64
kernel, so unless I can reproduce the problem, I suggest we leave the
current blacklist as is (thereby only quirking the pre-6.0 SYNOLOGY
volumes that are affected) and discard the new patch.

--
Michel


  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-20  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20160114003437.354D28EE1D4@bedivere.hansenpartnership.com>
2016-04-11  8:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] scsi: add Synology DSM 6.0 and higher to 1024 sector blacklist Michel Meyers
2016-04-12  2:20   ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-12  8:28     ` Michel Meyers
2016-04-12 18:42       ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-12 19:18         ` Mike Christie
2016-04-12 19:22           ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-20  8:46             ` Michel Meyers [this message]
2016-04-26  2:12               ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=571741F5.7060305@tcnnet.com \
    --to=steltek@tcnnet.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mchristi@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox