From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libfc: unsafe refcounting in fc_rport_work()
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:01:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <571DCED7.1030107@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461178992.14609.12.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On 04/20/2016 09:03 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 15:24 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> When pushing items on a workqueue we cannot take reference
>> when the workqueue item is executed, as the structure might
>> already been freed at that time.
>> So instead we need to take a reference before adding it
>> to the workqueue, thereby ensuring that the workqueue item
>> will always be valid.
>
> Have you actually seen this happen? The rdata structure is fully ref
> counted, so if it's done a final put, then something should see
> unreferenced memory. It looks like the model is that the final put is
> done from the queue, so I don't quite see how you can lose the final
> reference in either of the places you alter.
>
Yes, I _did_ see this happen; a customer was complaining about a
soft lockup happening in fc_rport_timeout every 30 seconds.
> Plus, kref_get_unless_zero() should not be used. At that point, the
> structure would be freed, so there's no point looking for it.
> kref_get_unless_zero is for refcounts that don't necessarily free the
> structure (embedded ones).
>
Yes, you are right; turns out to be a problem with mutexes and krefs
in general (cf https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/11/245).
I'll be sending a new patch.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-20 13:24 [PATCH] libfc: unsafe refcounting in fc_rport_work() Hannes Reinecke
2016-04-20 14:17 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-04-20 19:03 ` James Bottomley
2016-04-20 19:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-21 2:25 ` Ewan Milne
2016-04-21 20:11 ` James Bottomley
2016-04-21 12:39 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-04-25 8:01 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=571DCED7.1030107@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).