From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joao Pinto Subject: Re: UFS patchset Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 14:58:51 +0100 Message-ID: <57275D1B.9010005@synopsys.com> References: <57233664.3090101@synopsys.com> <572353C6.5070308@synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from us01smtprelay-2.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.111]:46532 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750844AbcEBN64 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2016 09:58:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Martin K. Petersen" , Joao Pinto Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" Hi Martin, On 4/30/2016 1:24 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >>>>>> "Martin" == Martin K Petersen writes: > > Joao, > > Martin> In a previous email you said you had sent v14 to > Martin> linux-scsi. However, I don't see neither v14, nor v13 in > Martin> patchworks. The latest I have is v12 and it does not apply to > Martin> 4.7/scsi-queue. > > I found v14 in my mailbox. Not sure why it's not in patchworks. > > In any case: It still doesn't apply to 4.7/scsi-queue and there are > several checkpatch warnings throughout the series. Please fix. > > Also make sure to prefix your patch subject lines with "ufs:" so it's > easy to identify which subsystem they go into. > > Thanks! > As promissed I sent you a new patch set based on the latest 4.7 queue branch, with "ufs:" prefix and completely tested and validated by checkpatch. Thanks. Joao