From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_dh_alua: do not fail for unknown VPD identification Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:12:16 -0700 Message-ID: <573240A0.6070400@sandisk.com> References: <1462523675-63172-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-bn1bon0087.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.111.87]:54804 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750922AbcEJU2P (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2016 16:28:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1462523675-63172-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke , "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Paul Mackerras , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke On 05/06/2016 01:34 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Not every device will return a useable VPD identification, but > still might support ALUA. Rather then disable ALUA support we > should be allowing the device identification to be empty and > attach individual ALUA device handler to each devices. > > Reported-by: Paul Mackerras > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke If you have to repost this please fix the spelling of "identifcation". Anyway: Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche