From: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
socketpair@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] target: fix max discard sectors calculation
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 12:17:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <573CA3C5.7050205@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <573C9EB1.1090208@sandisk.com>
On 05/18/2016 11:56 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 05/17/2016 02:49 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
>> @@ -821,13 +821,15 @@ struct se_device *target_alloc_device(struct
>> se_hba *hba, const char *name)
>> * in ATA and we need to set TPE=1
>> */
>> bool target_configure_unmap_from_queue(struct se_dev_attrib *attrib,
>> - struct request_queue *q, int block_size)
>> + struct request_queue *q)
>> {
>> + unsigned short block_size = queue_logical_block_size(q);
>> +
>> if (!blk_queue_discard(q))
>> return false;
>>
>> - attrib->max_unmap_lba_count = (q->limits.max_discard_sectors << 9) /
>> - block_size;
>> + attrib->max_unmap_lba_count = queue_sector_to_logical(q,
>> + q->limits.max_discard_sectors);
>> /*
>> * Currently hardcoded to 1 in Linux/SCSI code..
>> */
>> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
>> b/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
>> index 75f0f08..7929186 100644
>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
>> @@ -161,8 +161,7 @@ static int fd_configure_device(struct se_device *dev)
>> dev_size, div_u64(dev_size, fd_dev->fd_block_size),
>> fd_dev->fd_block_size);
>>
>> - if (target_configure_unmap_from_queue(&dev->dev_attrib, q,
>> - fd_dev->fd_block_size))
>> + if (target_configure_unmap_from_queue(&dev->dev_attrib, q))
>> pr_debug("IFILE: BLOCK Discard support available,"
>> " disabled by default\n");
>> /*
>> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
>> b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
>> index 026a758..3cbe060 100644
>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
>> @@ -121,8 +121,7 @@ static int iblock_configure_device(struct
>> se_device *dev)
>> dev->dev_attrib.hw_max_sectors = queue_max_hw_sectors(q);
>> dev->dev_attrib.hw_queue_depth = q->nr_requests;
>>
>> - if (target_configure_unmap_from_queue(&dev->dev_attrib, q,
>> - dev->dev_attrib.hw_block_size))
>> + if (target_configure_unmap_from_queue(&dev->dev_attrib, q))
>> pr_debug("IBLOCK: BLOCK Discard support available,"
>> " disabled by default\n");
>>
>> [ ... ]
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> Are you sure that LIO guarantees that dev_attrib.hw_block_size is
> identical to queue_logical_block_size(q)? The other changes in this
> patch look like a nice improvement to me.
>
Yeah. In iblock a line above where patch/diff started from above we do:
dev->dev_attrib.hw_block_size = bdev_logical_block_size(bd);
For the file setup code path we do:
fd_dev->fd_block_size = bdev_logical_block_size(inode->i_bdev);
and then a couple lines later we did:
if (target_configure_unmap_from_queue(&dev->dev_attrib, q,
fd_dev->fd_block_size))
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-18 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-16 18:46 [PATCH 0/2] fix max discard sectors calculation mchristi
2016-05-16 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: " mchristi
2016-05-16 22:44 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-17 3:46 ` Mike Christie
2016-05-16 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] target: " mchristi
2016-05-16 18:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-16 19:00 ` Mike Christie
2016-05-16 19:02 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-05-17 18:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-17 21:49 ` Mike Christie
2016-05-18 16:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-18 17:17 ` Mike Christie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=573CA3C5.7050205@redhat.com \
--to=mchristi@redhat.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=socketpair@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).