public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@huawei.com>,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Cc: fmdefrancesco@gmail.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	syzbot+f08c77040fa163a75a46@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	linfeilong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: call device_del() if device_add_disk() fails
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:19:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <574d33978be5eb4732cd3bf61727e6b509a7e484.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220331134210.GF12805@kadam>

On Thu, 2022-03-31 at 16:42 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
[...]
> Also, I don't really understand why we don't have to call
> put_device(&sdkp->disk_dev) at the end of sd_remove().

That's because the final put is done by the gendisk ->free_disk()
function which is scsi_disk_free_disk().  Most of the gendisk functions
we provide convert a gendisk to a scsi_disk (via the gendisk
private_data), so the sdkp has to live as long as the gendisk.

James



  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-31 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-29 15:49 [PATCH] scsi: sd: call device_del() if device_add_disk() fails Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-03-30  4:30 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-31 15:26 ` Wenchao Hao
2022-03-31  5:41   ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-31  5:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-31  9:07       ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-03-31  9:13         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-31 10:13           ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-03-31 12:14     ` Wenchao Hao
2022-03-31 13:42       ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-31 14:19         ` James Bottomley [this message]
2022-03-31 15:11           ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-31 16:14         ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-03-31 16:24           ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-31 17:21             ` Fabio M. De Francesco

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=574d33978be5eb4732cd3bf61727e6b509a7e484.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
    --cc=haowenchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=linfeilong@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=syzbot+f08c77040fa163a75a46@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox