From: Bin Wu <wu.wubin@huawei.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen_pvscsi: reclaim the ring request when mapping data failed
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:29:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <578439F5.4090400@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57836CB5.90401@suse.com>
On 2016/7/11 17:53, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 11/07/16 11:50, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 11/07/16 10:33, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 11/07/16 04:51, Bin Wu wrote:
>>>> During scsi command queueing, if mapping data fails, we need to
>>>> reclaim the failed request. Otherwise, the garbage request will
>>>> be pushed into the ring for the backend to work.
>>> Well spotted. There is another instance of this problem in
>>> scsifront_action_handler(). Would you mind correcting this one, too?
>> Would it make more sense to advance req_prod_pvt only if the request has
>> been successfully created?
> Yeah, probably as the first action in scsifront_do_request().
>
>
> Juergen
ok, I will send a new patch : )
>
>> David
>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bin Wu <wu.wubin@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
>>>> index 9dc8687..655163d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
>>>> @@ -565,6 +565,7 @@ static int scsifront_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host
>>>> *shost,
>>>> err = map_data_for_request(info, sc, ring_req, shadow);
>>>> if (err < 0) {
>>>> pr_debug("%s: err %d\n", __func__, err);
>>>> + info->ring.req_prod_pvt--;
>>>> scsifront_put_rqid(info, rqid);
>>>> scsifront_return(info);
>>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>>> https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>>>
>>
>
> .
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-12 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-11 2:51 [PATCH] xen_pvscsi: reclaim the ring request when mapping data failed Bin Wu
2016-07-11 9:33 ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-11 9:50 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-07-11 9:53 ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-12 0:29 ` Bin Wu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=578439F5.4090400@huawei.com \
--to=wu.wubin@huawei.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox