linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>,
	"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tyasui@redhat.com" <tyasui@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: avoid a permanent stop of the scsi device's request queue
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 14:59:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5847B355.2050100@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR02MB1683A85CB4376E9904F1B38881850@BLUPR02MB1683.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>

Hi, Bart,

On 2016/12/7 12:40, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> I am aware that commit 5c10e63c943b caused the behavior change. But that 
> doesn't mean that a fix has to undo the changes introduced by that 
> commit. We do not only want to make sure that the SCSI core works as 
> intended but also that the SCSI core code is as easy to comprehend as 
> reasonably possible. Adding "&& sdev->sdev_state != SDEV_RUNNING" in 
> scsi_internal_device_unblock() would require a long comment to explain 
> why that code has been added. I think modifying scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() 
> such that it does not unblock devices will result in code that is easier 
> to understand.

Agree that we should make the code easier to comprehend if possible :)

If we modify scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() as below:
        ...
        if (scsi_device_created(sdev))
                error = scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_RUNNING);
                if (error)
                        error = scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_BLOCK);
        ...
there's a chance that the state will be changed to SDEV_RUNNING.

If a SCSI device is blocked after the check of the device's creating
and before being changed to SDEV_RUNNING state, the state will still
become SDEV_RUNNING. If we fix this problem in this way, we need
introduce a way to synchronize those code.

Actually I don't know quite well about the synchronization of
scsi_device_set_state(). There are so many cases it can be called
simultaneously, will the state become a unpredictable value, or this
is tolerated?

Thanks,
Wei


  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-07  7:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-06  9:12 [PATCH] scsi: avoid a permanent stop of the scsi device's request queue Wei Fang
2016-12-06 15:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07  1:20   ` Wei Fang
2016-12-07  2:45     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07  3:41       ` Wei Fang
2016-12-07  4:40         ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07  6:59           ` Wei Fang [this message]
2016-12-07 16:48             ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07 16:55               ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07 17:40                 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-07 18:16                   ` James Bottomley
2016-12-07 19:24                     ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-07 20:09                       ` James Bottomley
2016-12-07 20:30                         ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-07 23:43                           ` James Bottomley
2016-12-08  2:28                             ` Wei Fang
2016-12-08  2:33                               ` James Bottomley
2016-12-08  3:22                                 ` Wei Fang
2016-12-08  6:38                                   ` Wei Fang
2016-12-08 14:04                                     ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-08 15:39                                   ` James Bottomley
2016-12-09  1:08                                     ` Wei Fang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5847B355.2050100@huawei.com \
    --to=fangwei1@huawei.com \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=tyasui@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).