From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com>,
lindar_liu@usish.com,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
pmchba@pmcs.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: pm8001: build in relevant functions and code on PM8001_USE_MSIX
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:34:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58D3889B.7030400@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170322185004.1012-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Am 22.03.2017 19:50, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Currently the misx and intx variables of the interrupt enable/disable
> helper functions are built in no matter what the setting of the
> macro PM8001_USE_MSIX. Clean this up by just building in the
> necessary helper functions and calls to these functions depending on
> the setting of PM8001_USE_MSIX. This addresses several dead code
> paths found by static analysis with CoverityScan.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c
> index 10546faac58c..d1be10fd1350 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c
> @@ -1204,26 +1204,7 @@ void pm8001_chip_iounmap(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> }
> }
>
> -/**
> - * pm8001_chip_interrupt_enable - enable PM8001 chip interrupt
> - * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> - */
> -static void
> -pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_enable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> -{
> - pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODMR, ODMR_CLEAR_ALL);
> - pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODCR, ODCR_CLEAR_ALL);
> -}
> -
> - /**
> - * pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable- disable PM8001 chip interrupt
> - * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> - */
> -static void
> -pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> -{
> - pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODMR, ODMR_MASK_ALL);
> -}
> +#ifdef PM8001_USE_MSIX
>
> /**
> * pm8001_chip_msix_interrupt_enable - enable PM8001 chip interrupt
> @@ -1257,6 +1238,30 @@ pm8001_chip_msix_interrupt_disable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
> pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, msi_index, MSIX_INTERRUPT_DISABLE);
> }
>
> +#else
> +
> +/**
> + * pm8001_chip_interrupt_enable - enable PM8001 chip interrupt
> + * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> + */
> +static void
> +pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_enable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> +{
> + pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODMR, ODMR_CLEAR_ALL);
> + pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODCR, ODCR_CLEAR_ALL);
> +}
> +
> + /**
> + * pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable- disable PM8001 chip interrupt
> + * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> + */
> +static void
> +pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> +{
> + pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODMR, ODMR_MASK_ALL);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /**
> * pm8001_chip_interrupt_enable - enable PM8001 chip interrupt
> * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> @@ -1266,10 +1271,9 @@ pm8001_chip_interrupt_enable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u8 vec)
> {
> #ifdef PM8001_USE_MSIX
> pm8001_chip_msix_interrupt_enable(pm8001_ha, 0);
> - return;
> -#endif
> +#else
> pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_enable(pm8001_ha);
> -
> +#endif
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1281,10 +1285,9 @@ pm8001_chip_interrupt_disable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u8 vec)
> {
> #ifdef PM8001_USE_MSIX
> pm8001_chip_msix_interrupt_disable(pm8001_ha, 0);
> - return;
> -#endif
> +#else
> pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable(pm8001_ha);
> -
> +#endif
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -4613,15 +4616,15 @@ static int pm8001_chip_phy_ctl_req(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
>
> static u32 pm8001_chip_is_our_interupt(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> {
> - u32 value;
> #ifdef PM8001_USE_MSIX
> return 1;
> -#endif
> - value = pm8001_cr32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODR);
> +#else
> + u32 value = pm8001_cr32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODR);
> +
> if (value)
> return 1;
> return 0;
> -
> +#endif
> }
>
This is a bit strange, why do this function return u32 ?
re,
wh
> /**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-23 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 18:50 [PATCH] scsi: pm8001: build in relevant functions and code on PM8001_USE_MSIX Colin King
2017-03-23 8:34 ` walter harms [this message]
2017-03-23 9:17 ` Jinpu Wang
2017-03-23 9:16 ` Jinpu Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58D3889B.7030400@bfs.de \
--to=wharms@bfs.de \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lindar_liu@usish.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=pmchba@pmcs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox