From: Muneendra Kumar M <muneendra.kumar@broadcom.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jsmart2021@gmail.com, emilne@redhat.com, mkumar@redhat.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/5] scsi_transport_fc: Added a new sysfs attribute noretries_abort
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:03:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58f0f6051d6ef99c29a3695d2a8571ff@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <354f6b67-4a54-1807-b205-d3c0b71906b5@suse.de>
Hi Hannes,
>>>
>>> Hmm. Wouldn't it make more sense to introduce a new port state
>>> 'marginal'
>>> for this? We might >want/need to introduce additional error recovery
>>> mechanisms here, so having a new state >might be easier in the long
>>> run ...
>Ah. So that changes things slightly; I had hoped we can address things
>systematically, but with link integrity issues we don't have any other
>choice but to replace the cable (ie wait for user interaction).
>But still I'm in favour of the 'marginal' state; that one could be set
>manually (or by an FPIN LI event), and would need to be reset either
>manually or by link reset.
>And have the advantage of being easier to implement :-)
Thanks for the review.
I will incorporate all your review comments and will add marginal state in
my next version.
Regards,
Muneendra.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-14 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-05 2:50 [PATCH 0/5] scsi: Support to handle Intermittent errors Muneendra
2020-08-05 2:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] scsi: Added a new macro in scsi_cmnd.h Muneendra
2020-08-10 6:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-05 2:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] scsi: Clear state bit SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT of scsi_cmd before start request Muneendra
2020-08-10 6:11 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-05 2:51 ` [PATCH 3/5] scsi: No retries on abort success Muneendra
2020-08-10 6:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-05 2:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] scsi: Added routine to set SCMD_NORETRIES_ABORT bit for outstanding io on scsi_dev Muneendra
2020-08-10 6:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-05 2:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi_transport_fc: Added a new sysfs attribute noretries_abort Muneendra
2020-08-10 6:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-11 6:01 ` Muneendra Kumar M
2020-08-11 6:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-11 7:03 ` Muneendra Kumar M
2020-08-11 14:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-14 5:33 ` Muneendra Kumar M [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58f0f6051d6ef99c29a3695d2a8571ff@mail.gmail.com \
--to=muneendra.kumar@broadcom.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jsmart2021@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkumar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox