From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Christie Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/26] target/iscsi: Allocate session IDs from an IDA Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:05:49 -0500 Message-ID: <5B5B892D.1000305@redhat.com> References: <20180621212835.5636-1-willy@infradead.org> <20180621212835.5636-19-willy@infradead.org> <5B59FB56.9090901@redhat.com> <5B5A014D.9060901@redhat.com> <20180727193814.GB3825@bombadil.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180727193814.GB3825@bombadil.infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , Bart Van Assche , Hannes Reinecke , Kees Cook , Varun Prakash , Sagi Grimberg , Philippe Ombredanne , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kate Stewart , Thomas Gleixner , "David S. Miller" , Denys Vlasenko , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K. Petersen" List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 07/27/2018 02:38 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:13:49PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote: >> If we want to fix the bug first, then I made the attached patch and I >> can submit it. > > How about I take it through my tree to minimise the amount of rebasing > I'll need to do? I'm already dependent on the nvdimm tree and I'd rather > not depend on the scsi tree as well. I'll queue it up in front of my > IDA change to maximise its backportability. Ccing Martin, because he has been handling target patches. The above plan sounds ok to me.