From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7DFC636CC for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 23:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229525AbjBGXLx (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2023 18:11:53 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55568 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229483AbjBGXLw (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2023 18:11:52 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f179.google.com (mail-pg1-f179.google.com [209.85.215.179]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0615DC648 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:11:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-f179.google.com with SMTP id x10so480752pgx.3 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 15:11:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gOQ0yI/0N++HamuO/wHG+PtESqK1M06+84RevsPhEt4=; b=kD1GB4rtjzgHmh06tIVLe7U3woGF1rND23laPBMfYzlNZj9c0xnNpzPKYLeDkV74dt K6/Fgu10Vr/qPACHT9+MaVeXUe+g9BZBBVQ243js+Q/sBsqSjXPOsgd449imVZ+xBJKB yEqPDaKK2qgqWh8hIWOSHyFYRqd6OATvuJdmRUKGshirNcgmFdsd4ON3NbirW27vfwSl X1BNPB3YYTd7NUeGbt+or9mvEvLb/61gHLtyxd4ggFUIHlD6RopmCIZ+kmE8HGmbvGVM ze5SLZrWh6SAco0IBftalAP8eNV54vYid5BuP24PV0OPYbGiCFSCzU8PO6XqWByj+kku hLVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKX5VqLTqm/9Kr0g/byqaWqurcoSIpwWkBpW+qUy7EE+M3bLaq9w 3rpyi+1l172aAzfNmzkDiJI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9kDBU0nJZZkpGIei5ONVhrKKUAzYOMLjqvoVnCQGCzOncBs1utwD/hBllHCKTq0OLEMHTE4w== X-Received: by 2002:a62:8415:0:b0:5a8:25c8:f375 with SMTP id k21-20020a628415000000b005a825c8f375mr404435pfd.17.1675811510209; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 15:11:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2620:15c:211:201:1000:8a4b:e165:69ed? ([2620:15c:211:201:1000:8a4b:e165:69ed]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d131-20020a621d89000000b0059393d46228sm10095863pfd.144.2023.02.07.15.11.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Feb 2023 15:11:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5d293df3-6f94-d3a6-5bfb-35b191808582@acm.org> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:11:46 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: probe hba and add lus synchronously Content-Language: en-US To: Adrien Thierry Cc: Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org References: <20230202182116.38334-1-athierry@redhat.com> <0e955a31-1d3a-beca-4581-dbcdefc47674@acm.org> <90e4fb52-6b09-00d9-7591-7140b859ed15@acm.org> From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 2/7/23 14:54, Adrien Thierry wrote: > Do you think this could be an acceptable compromise for boot time? It > should not slow things down too much since the really time-consuming parts > (ie. UFS initialization) would still be in the async routine. Hi Adrien, That sounds good to me. Thank you for having suggested an alternative solution. Bart.