From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Stop clearing unit attentions
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:59:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e087a0f-7ae0-41d1-c1f1-e5cc0ad2d38f@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2436720-16d5-58da-abcc-20fa1ed01fb9@intel.com>
On 9/30/21 11:52 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Finally, there is another thing to change. The reason
> ufshcd_suspend_prepare() does a runtime resume of sdev_rpmb is because the
> UAC clear would wait for an async runtime resume, which will never happen
> during system suspend because the PM workqueue gets frozen. So with the
> removal of UAC clear, ufshcd_suspend_prepare() and ufshcd_resume_complete()
> should be updated also, to leave rpmb alone.
Is the following change what you have in mind?
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 0a28cc4c09d8..0743f54e55f9 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -9648,10 +9648,6 @@ void ufshcd_resume_complete(struct device *dev)
ufshcd_rpm_put(hba);
hba->complete_put = false;
}
- if (hba->rpmb_complete_put) {
- ufshcd_rpmb_rpm_put(hba);
- hba->rpmb_complete_put = false;
- }
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_resume_complete);
@@ -9674,10 +9670,6 @@ int ufshcd_suspend_prepare(struct device *dev)
}
hba->complete_put = true;
}
- if (hba->sdev_rpmb) {
- ufshcd_rpmb_rpm_get_sync(hba);
- hba->rpmb_complete_put = true;
- }
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_suspend_prepare);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
index 86b615023ecb..5ecfcd8cae0a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -921,7 +921,6 @@ struct ufs_hba {
#endif
u32 luns_avail;
bool complete_put;
- bool rpmb_complete_put;
};
/* Returns true if clocks can be gated. Otherwise false */
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-01 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-30 19:52 [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: retry START_STOP on UNIT_ATTENTION Jaegeuk Kim
2021-09-30 19:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Stop clearing unit attentions Jaegeuk Kim
2021-10-01 4:58 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-10-01 6:52 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-10-01 16:59 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-10-01 17:21 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-10-01 17:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-01 17:24 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-10-01 16:19 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-09-30 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: retry START_STOP on UNIT_ATTENTION Bart Van Assche
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-01 18:20 [PATCH 0/2 v2] kill clearing UA in UFS driver Jaegeuk Kim
2021-10-01 18:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Stop clearing unit attentions Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e087a0f-7ae0-41d1-c1f1-e5cc0ad2d38f@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=bvanassche@google.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox