public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Peter Wang (王信友)" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com"
	<James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	"avri.altman@wdc.com" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
	"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	"ahalaney@redhat.com" <ahalaney@redhat.com>,
	"manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org"
	<manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] scsi: ufs: Check for completion from the timeout handler
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:12:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <671bb45f-22a1-4f81-ae93-65bd5a86f374@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6d329a3d822cb34c8a5bee36403c59ceab015a0.camel@mediatek.com>

On 6/24/24 1:54 AM, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
> Your backtrace is Single doorbell mode. But I am curious that
> how could it happen if complete a cmd twice and get null pointer
> next time queuecommand? could you describe the exactly flow?

SCSI commands are completed only once. See also the code in the SCSI
core that sets the SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE bit:

$ git grep -nH 'test_and_set_bit(SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE'
drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c:362:	if (test_and_set_bit(SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE, 
&scmd->state))
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1716:	if 
(unlikely(test_and_set_bit(SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE, &cmd->state)))

In other words, either the regular completion code is executed by
scsi_done_internal() or error handling is initiated by scsi_timeout().
Only one of the two happens.

The only exception is that .eh_timed_out() may be called concurrently
with the regular completion handler. Hence this patch for
ufshcd_eh_timed_out().

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-24 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-17 21:07 [PATCH 0/8] UFS patches for kernel 6.11 Bart Van Assche
2024-06-17 21:07 ` [PATCH 1/8] scsi: ufs: Initialize struct uic_command once Bart Van Assche
2024-06-18  1:25   ` Daejun Park
2024-06-18 16:15     ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-18  6:18   ` Avri Altman
2024-06-19  6:55   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-06-17 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/8] scsi: ufs: Remove two constants Bart Van Assche
2024-06-19  6:58   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-06-17 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/8] scsi: ufs: Inline ufshcd_mcq_vops_get_hba_mac() Bart Van Assche
2024-06-18  6:23   ` Avri Altman
2024-06-18 16:14     ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-17 21:07 ` [PATCH 4/8] scsi: ufs: Make .get_hba_mac() optional Bart Van Assche
2024-06-18  1:28   ` Daejun Park
2024-06-18 16:17     ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-19  7:13   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-06-19  7:57     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-06-21  3:32       ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-06-23 13:33         ` manivannan.sadhasivam
2024-06-24  8:39           ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-06-24 17:30             ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-17 21:07 ` [PATCH 5/8] scsi: ufs: Declare ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() once Bart Van Assche
2024-06-18 11:01   ` Avri Altman
2024-06-17 21:07 ` [PATCH 6/8] scsi: ufs: Make ufshcd_poll() complain about unsupported arguments Bart Van Assche
2024-06-19  7:32   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-06-20 20:13     ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-23 13:39       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-06-17 21:07 ` [PATCH 7/8] scsi: ufs: Make the polling code report which command has been completed Bart Van Assche
2024-06-17 21:07 ` [PATCH 8/8] scsi: ufs: Check for completion from the timeout handler Bart Van Assche
2024-06-21  6:54   ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-06-21 17:23     ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-24  8:54       ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-06-24 18:12         ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2024-06-25 10:04           ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-06-25 16:33             ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-26  3:54               ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-06-26 21:54                 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-27 10:56                   ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-06-27 16:33                     ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-27  3:50   ` Wenchao Hao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=671bb45f-22a1-4f81-ae93-65bd5a86f374@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=ahalaney@redhat.com \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox