Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "yebin (H)" <yebin10@huawei.com>
To: <sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev>, Ye Bin <yebin@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: iscsi: fix NULL pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn()
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 17:32:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6A881B1B.9010306@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820022614.CAEDD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>



On 2026/8/20 10:26, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Use-after-free of `iscsi_cls_conn` due to missing cancellation of `cleanup_work` on release.
> --
>
> --- Patch [1]: [PATCH] scsi: iscsi: fix NULL pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn() ---
> commit bdfb05c9a6c008e559f81d0c3e5ffb712699e0cc
> Author: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
>
> scsi: iscsi: fix NULL pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn()
>
> This commit fixes a NULL pointer dereference by setting the
> ISCSI_CLS_CONN_BIT_CLEANUP bit when userspace delivers STOP_CONN_TERM.
> This prevents concurrent execution of iscsi_stop_conn() and cancels or
> flushes the kernel connection cleanup work as needed.
>
> Fixes: 23d6fefbb3f6 ("scsi: iscsi: Fix in-kernel conn failure handling")
>
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
>> @@ -2266,6 +2266,8 @@ static void iscsi_if_disconnect_bound_ep(struct iscsi_cls_conn *conn,
>>
>>   static int iscsi_if_stop_conn(struct iscsi_cls_conn *conn, int flag)
>>   {
>> +	bool cleanup;
>> +
>>   	ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_CONN(conn, "iscsi if conn stop.\n");
>>   	/*
>>   	 * For offload, iscsid may not know about the ep like when iscsid is
> [ ... ]
>> -	if (flag == STOP_CONN_TERM) {
>> -		cancel_work_sync(&conn->cleanup_work);
>> -		iscsi_stop_conn(conn, flag);
>> -	} else {
>> +	spin_lock_irq(&conn->lock);
>> +	cleanup = test_and_set_bit(ISCSI_CLS_CONN_BIT_CLEANUP, &conn->flags);
>> +	spin_unlock_irq(&conn->lock);
>> +
>> +	if (cleanup) {
>>   		/*
>> -		 * Figure out if it was the kernel or userspace initiating this.
>> +		 * If this is a termination we have to call stop_conn with
>> +		 * that flag so the correct states get set. If we haven't
>> +		 * run the work yet try to avoid the extra run.
>>   		 */
>> -		spin_lock_irq(&conn->lock);
>> -		if (!test_and_set_bit(ISCSI_CLS_CONN_BIT_CLEANUP, &conn->flags)) {
>> -			spin_unlock_irq(&conn->lock);
>> +		if (flag == STOP_CONN_TERM) {
>> +			ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_CONN(conn,
>> +					"cancel kernel conn cleanup.\n");
>> +			cancel_work_sync(&conn->cleanup_work);
>
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but since we are modifying cleanup_work
> handling here, is there a risk of a use-after-free if the connection is
> destroyed before the work executes?
>
> Looking at iscsi_conn_error_event(), it queues conn->cleanup_work without
> taking a reference to the connection. If a session is torn down before the
> work executes (e.g. via device removal calling iscsi_remove_session()),
> iscsi_iter_destroy_conn_fn() drops the references:
>
Indeed, this issue does exist, although it is unrelated to this revision.
I will fix this issue and send another version.

> drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c:iscsi_iter_destroy_conn_fn()
>      ...
>      iscsi_remove_conn(iscsi_dev_to_conn(dev));
>      iscsi_put_conn(iscsi_dev_to_conn(dev));
>
> This final reference drop triggers iscsi_conn_release(), which frees the
> connection memory:
>
> drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c:iscsi_conn_release()
>      ...
>      kfree(conn);
>
> Since iscsi_conn_release() does not call cancel_work_sync(&conn->cleanup_work),
> could iscsi_cleanup_conn_work_fn() execute and dereference the already freed
> conn struct? Should we be cancelling or flushing the work during
> iscsi_conn_release() to prevent this?
>
>>   			iscsi_stop_conn(conn, flag);
>>   		} else {
>> -			spin_unlock_irq(&conn->lock);
>>   			ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_CONN(conn,
>> -					     "flush kernel conn cleanup.\n");
>> +					"flush kernel conn cleanup.\n");
>>   			flush_work(&conn->cleanup_work);
>>   		}
>

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-21  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-20  2:03 [PATCH] scsi: iscsi: fix NULL pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn() Ye Bin
2026-08-20  2:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21  9:32   ` yebin (H) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6A881B1B.9010306@huawei.com \
    --to=yebin10@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=yebin@huaweicloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox