From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arvind Yadav Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/29] constify scsi pci_device_id. Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:23:11 +0530 Message-ID: <6b6ba203-1352-26ed-8d7e-c14e7bb25d32@gmail.com> References: <1501403839-8876-1-git-send-email-arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> <20170731075647.GB4316@linux-x5ow.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170731075647.GB4316@linux-x5ow.site> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Thumshirn Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mdr@sgi.com, hare@suse.com, aacraid@adaptec.com, matthew@wil.cx, fthain@telegraphics.com.au, schmitzmic@gmail.com, kashyap.desai@broadcom.com, sumit.saxena@broadcom.com, gotom@debian.or.jp, mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com, yokota@netlab.is.tsukuba.ac.jp, QLogic-Storage-Upstream@cavium.com, jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Monday 31 July 2017 01:26 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 02:07:09PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote: >> pci_device_id are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions >> working with pci_device_id provided by work with >> const pci_device_id. So mark the non-const structs as const. > Can't this go all in one patch instead of replicating the same patch 29 > times? Yes, We can add all of them in single patch. But other maintainer wants single single patch. thats why I have send 29 patch. :( > Thanks, > Johannes > ~arvind