From: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
To: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>, daejun7.park@samsung.com
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
avri.altman@wdc.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
stanley.chu@mediatek.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@samsung.com>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@samsung.com>,
Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@samsung.com>,
BoRam Shin <boram.shin@samsung.com>,
SEUNGUK SHIN <seunguk.shin@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 2/3] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 10:14:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bcd5f74352a63fb96de1640ea4b453f150a88f5.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <652fa8013c26df497049abe923eb1b97@codeaurora.org>
On Sat, 2021-02-06 at 15:23 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
> > + dev_dbg(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev, "Noti: #ACT %u #INACT
> > %u\n",
> > + rsp_field->active_rgn_cnt, rsp_field-
> > >inactive_rgn_cnt);
> > +
> > + queue_work(ufshpb_wq, &hpb->map_work);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * This function will parse recommended active subregion
> > information
> > in sense
> > + * data field of response UPIU with SAM_STAT_GOOD state.
> > + */
> > +void ufshpb_rsp_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
> > +{
> > + struct ufshpb_lu *hpb = ufshpb_get_hpb_data(lrbp->cmd-
> > >device);
> > + struct utp_hpb_rsp *rsp_field;
> > + int data_seg_len;
> > +
> > + if (!hpb)
> > + return;
>
> You are assuming HPB recommandations only come in responses to LUs
> with HPB enabled, but the specs says the recommandations can come
> in any responses with GOOD status, meaning you should check the *hpb
> which belongs to the LUN in res_field, but not the one belongs to
> lrbp->cmd->device.
>
correct, see here HPB driver patch :).
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-scsi/patch/20200504142032.16619-6-beanhuo@micron.com/
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_SCSI_UFSHPB)
+ /*
+ * HPB recommendations are provided in RESPONSE
UPIU
+ * packets of successfully completed commands,
which
+ * are commands terminated with GOOD status.
+ */
+ if (scsi_status == SAM_STAT_GOOD)
+ ufshpb_rsp_handler(hba, lrbp);
+#endif
break;
case UPIU_TRANSACTION_REJECT_UPIU:
/* TODO: handle Reject UPIU Response */
we need re-test this series patch seriously.
Thanks Can.
Bean
> Regards,
>
> Can Guo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-06 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20210129052848epcms2p6e5797efd94e6282b76ad9ae6c99e3ab5@epcms2p6>
2021-01-29 5:28 ` [PATCH v19 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Daejun Park
2021-01-29 5:29 ` [PATCH v19 1/3] scsi: ufs: Introduce HPB feature Daejun Park
2021-02-02 7:46 ` Avri Altman
2021-02-02 11:12 ` Greg KH
2021-01-29 5:30 ` [PATCH v19 2/3] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Daejun Park
2021-02-05 11:15 ` Bean Huo
2021-02-05 11:42 ` Avri Altman
2021-02-05 11:54 ` Bean Huo
2021-02-08 8:00 ` Daejun Park
2021-02-06 7:23 ` Can Guo
2021-02-06 9:14 ` Bean Huo [this message]
2021-02-06 19:17 ` Avri Altman
2021-02-08 8:01 ` Daejun Park
2021-02-08 7:21 ` Can Guo
2021-02-08 8:03 ` Daejun Park
2021-02-08 8:34 ` Can Guo
2021-02-08 8:53 ` Daejun Park
2021-02-08 9:23 ` Can Guo
2021-02-09 1:27 ` Daejun Park
2021-02-09 2:28 ` Can Guo
2021-01-29 5:30 ` [PATCH v19 3/3] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region Daejun Park
2021-02-05 3:29 ` Can Guo
2021-02-05 12:35 ` Bean Huo
2021-02-05 14:06 ` Avri Altman
2021-02-05 15:08 ` Bean Huo
2021-02-07 7:36 ` Can Guo
2021-02-07 10:44 ` Bean Huo
2021-02-09 13:25 ` Avri Altman
2021-02-09 14:21 ` Bean Huo
2021-02-10 5:32 ` Can Guo
2021-02-08 8:16 ` Bean Huo
2021-02-08 9:58 ` Can Guo
2021-02-10 9:36 ` Avri Altman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6bcd5f74352a63fb96de1640ea4b453f150a88f5.camel@gmail.com \
--to=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=boram.shin@samsung.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=j-young.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=seunguk.shin@samsung.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=sungjun07.park@samsung.com \
--cc=ymhungry.lee@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox