From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: tom.ty89@gmail.com, tj@kernel.org
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] libata-core: do not set dev->max_sectors for LBA48 devices
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 19:50:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d86e101-bfa4-71a5-5c3c-0f35e3fdfc20@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10c4d38005e24bb477b5182d4fc17879139f14d9.1470753817.git.tom.ty89@gmail.com>
Hello.
On 08/09/2016 05:45 PM, tom.ty89@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com>
>
> Currently block layer limit max_hw_sectors is set to
> ATA_MAX_SECTORS_LBA48 (65535), for devices with LBA48 support.
>
> However, block layer limit max_sectors (which is the effective
> one; also adjustable, upper-bounded by max_hw_sectors) is set to
> BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS (currently 2560) by the scsi disk driver,
> since libata's SATL does not report an Optimal Transfer Length.
>
> This does not make much sense, especially when the current
> BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS appears to be unsafe for some ATA devices
> (see ATA_HORKAGE_MAX_SEC_1024). Truth is, the current value
> appears to be arbitrary anyway. See commit d2be537c3ba3
> ("block: bump BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS to 2560").
>
> Therefore, avoid setting dev->max_sectors when it is strictly
> necessary. Leave it as 0 otherwise, so that both block layer
Hmm, avoid it if it's strictly necessary?
> limits will remain as SCSI_DEFAULT_MAX_SECTORS (currently 1024).
You forgot to sign off on the patch.
MBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-09 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-09 14:45 [PATCH v2 1/2] libata-scsi: set max_hw_sectors again only when dev->max_sectors is set tom.ty89
2016-08-09 14:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] libata-core: do not set dev->max_sectors for LBA48 devices tom.ty89
2016-08-09 16:50 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2016-08-10 4:10 ` Tejun Heo
2016-08-10 8:32 ` Tom Yan
2016-08-10 15:22 ` Tejun Heo
2016-08-11 3:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-08-11 9:30 ` Tom Yan
2016-08-12 2:01 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-08-12 5:18 ` Tom Yan
2016-08-12 8:17 ` Tom Yan
2016-08-12 21:06 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-08-12 9:16 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-08-12 21:17 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6d86e101-bfa4-71a5-5c3c-0f35e3fdfc20@cogentembedded.com \
--to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tom.ty89@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).