Re: [PATCH V5 00/11] Refactor ufs phy powerup sequence

Nitin Rawat
2025-05-27T15:23:57Z

On 5/21/2025 6:40 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 09:45:40PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nitin!
>>
>>> Nitin Rawat (11):
>>> scsi: ufs: qcom: add a new phy calibrate API call
>>> phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_enable and qmp_ufs_power_on
>>> phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks
>>> phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Refactor UFS PHY reset
>>> phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_com_init()
>>> phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_power_off
>>> phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_exit() and Inline qmp_ufs_com_exit()
>>> phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: refactor qmp_ufs_power_off
>>> scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls
>>> scsi: ufs: qcom : Introduce phy_power_on/off wrapper function
>>> scsi: ufs: qcom: Prevent calling phy_exit before phy_init
>>
>> What is your intent wrt. getting this series merged? Can the phy: and
>> scsi: patches be merged independently?
>
> Unfortunately PHY patches depend on the first scsi patch.

Thanks, Dmitry, for mentioning the dependency

Hi Martin,

After addressing the review comments for v5, there has been a change in
the patch order.

In the latest patchset (v6), Patch 2 (SCSI patch) is now required for
the functional dependency of the subsequent PHY patches (Patch 3 to
Patch 9).

Patch 1 (SCSI patch) addresses an existing issue and does not depend on
any other changes.

Regards,
Nitin

>