From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Shivasharan Srikanteshwara
<shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com>
Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
axboe@kernel.dk, mpe@ellerman.id.au, keith.busch@intel.com,
peterz@infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: system hung up when offlining CPUs
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 12:01:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <705231c2-4680-b226-3854-e0df61439d68@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711010105260.1942@nanos>
On 11/01/2017 01:47 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Shivasharan Srikanteshwara wrote:
>
>> In managed-interrupts case, interrupts which were affine to the offlined
>> CPU is not getting migrated to another available CPU. But the
>> documentation at below link says that "all interrupts" are migrated to a
>> new CPU. So not all interrupts are getting migrated to a new CPU then.
>
> Correct.
>
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.11/core-api/cpu_hotplug.html#the-offlin
>> e-case
>> "- All interrupts targeted to this CPU are migrated to a new CPU"
>
> Well, documentation is not always up to date :)
>
>> Once the last CPU in the affinity mask is offlined and a particular IRQ
>> is shutdown, is there a way currently for the device driver to get
>> callback to complete all outstanding requests on that queue?
>
> No and I have no idea how the other drivers deal with that.
>
> The way you can do that is to have your own hotplug callback which is
> invoked when the cpu goes down, but way before the interrupt is shut down,
> which is one of the last steps. Ideally this would be a callback in the
> generic block code which then calls out to all instances like its done for
> the cpu dead state.
>
In principle, yes, that would be (and, in fact, might already) moved to
the block layer for blk-mq, as this has full control over the individual
queues and hence can ensure that the queues with dead/removed CPUs are
properly handled.
Here, OTOH, we are dealing with the legacy sq implementation (or, to be
precised, a blk-mq implementation utilizing only a single queue), so
that any of this handling need to be implemented in the driver.
So what would need to be done here is to implement a hotplug callback in
the driver, which would disable the CPU from the list/bitmap of valid
cpus. Then the driver could validate the CPU number with this bitmap
upon I/O submission (instead of just using raw_smp_cpu_number()), and
could set the queue ID to '0' if an invalid CPU was found.
With that the driver should be able to ensure that no new I/O will be
submitted which will hit the dead CPU, so with a bit of luck this might
already solve the problem.
Alternatively I could resurrect my patchset converting the driver to
blk-mq, which got vetoed the last time ...
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-01 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <c55a33b4-a886-8882-dd8d-5c488f94ee06@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20170809124213.0d9518bb@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org>
[not found] ` <cd524af7-1f20-1956-1e44-92a451053387@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <c1c7e0d6-d908-b511-8418-bca288a0d20a@arm.com>
[not found] ` <20170821131809.GA17564@lst.de>
[not found] ` <fce0ad52-8739-09c8-ec9d-a23eb92cec5a@arm.com>
[not found] ` <8e0d76cd-7cd4-3a98-12ba-815f00d4d772@gmail.com>
2017-09-12 18:15 ` system hung up when offlining CPUs YASUAKI ISHIMATSU
2017-09-13 11:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-09-13 11:35 ` Kashyap Desai
2017-09-13 13:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-14 16:28 ` YASUAKI ISHIMATSU
2017-09-16 10:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-16 15:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-02 16:36 ` YASUAKI ISHIMATSU
2017-10-03 21:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-04 21:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-10 16:30 ` YASUAKI ISHIMATSU
2017-10-16 18:59 ` YASUAKI ISHIMATSU
2017-10-16 20:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-30 9:08 ` Shivasharan Srikanteshwara
2017-11-01 0:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-01 11:01 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2017-10-04 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=705231c2-4680-b226-3854-e0df61439d68@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com \
--cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox