From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@synopsys.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@codeaurora.org>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Unlock on a couple error paths
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 13:04:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70d90cda-afe7-30bd-c871-c9d37bee98aa@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191213104828.7i64cpoof26rc4fw@kili.mountain>
On 12/13/19 5:48 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We introduced a few new error paths, but we can't return directly, we
> first have to unlock "hba->clk_scaling_lock" first.
This may have escaped from my attention due to having swapped the order
of the patch that removed that locking and the patch this patch is a fix
for. Anyway, thanks for this patch.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-13 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-13 10:48 [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Unlock on a couple error paths Dan Carpenter
2019-12-13 10:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Simplify a condition Dan Carpenter
2019-12-13 20:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-12-14 4:28 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-12-15 6:06 ` Avri Altman
2019-12-13 20:04 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2019-12-17 3:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Unlock on a couple error paths Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70d90cda-afe7-30bd-c871-c9d37bee98aa@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=pedrom.sousa@synopsys.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=venkatg@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox