From: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@avagotech.com>
To: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>,
jbottomley@parallels.com, hch@infradead.org,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@avagotech.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 10/15] megaraid_sas: IO throttling support
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:48:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75f584b953b9ad3a901011e049e3715e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <569E3C3C.6040507@redhat.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tomas Henzl [mailto:thenzl@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 7:08 PM
> To: Sumit Saxena; jbottomley@parallels.com; hch@infradead.org;
> martin.petersen@oracle.com
> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; kashyap.desai@avagotech.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] megaraid_sas: IO throttling support
>
> On 18.12.2015 14:27, Sumit Saxena wrote:
> > This patch will add capability in driver to tell firmware that it can
> > throttle IOs in case Controller's Queue depth is downgraded post OFU
(Online
> firmware upgrade). This feature will ensure firmware can be downgraded
from
> higher queue depth to lower queue depth without needing system reboot.
> > Added throttling code in IO path of driver, in case OS tries to send
more IOs
> than post OFU firmware's queue depth.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@avagotech.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@avagotech.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h | 6 ++++--
> > drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c | 7 +++++++
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> > b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> > index 4595ef4..9d2b3da 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> > @@ -1537,7 +1537,8 @@ union megasas_sgl_frame { typedef union
> > _MFI_CAPABILITIES {
> > struct {
> > #if defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> > - u32 reserved:21;
> > + u32 reserved:20;
> > + u32 support_qd_throttling:1;
> > u32 support_fp_rlbypass:1;
> > u32 support_vfid_in_ioframe:1;
> > u32 support_ext_io_size:1;
> > @@ -1561,7 +1562,8 @@ typedef union _MFI_CAPABILITIES {
> > u32 support_ext_io_size:1;
> > u32 support_vfid_in_ioframe:1;
> > u32 support_fp_rlbypass:1;
> > - u32 reserved:21;
> > + u32 support_qd_throttling:1;
> > + u32 reserved:20;
> > #endif
> > } mfi_capabilities;
> > __le32 reg;
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> > b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> > index 7cc7806..1248c7a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> > @@ -801,6 +801,7 @@ megasas_ioc_init_fusion(struct megasas_instance
> *instance)
> > if (!dual_qdepth_disable)
> > drv_ops->mfi_capabilities.support_ext_queue_depth = 1;
> >
> > + drv_ops->mfi_capabilities.support_qd_throttling = 1;
> > /* Convert capability to LE32 */
> > cpu_to_le32s((u32
> > *)&init_frame->driver_operations.mfi_capabilities);
> >
> > @@ -2182,6 +2183,12 @@ megasas_build_and_issue_cmd_fusion(struct
> megasas_instance *instance,
> > atomic_inc(&instance->ldio_outstanding);
> > }
> >
> > + if (atomic_read(&instance->fw_outstanding) >=
> > + instance->host->can_queue) {
> > + dev_err(&instance->pdev->dev, "Throttle IOs beyond
Controller
> queue depth\n");
> > + return SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY;
> > + }
>
> Same as in the previous patch, this this test above won't you protect
when
> several processes read the same value in parallel. In addition to that,
when the
> scsi layer knows the new smaller can_queue value it will not queue new
> commands above the limit.
Agree that SCSI mid layer itself will not send IOs beyond can_queue value
and we can remove this code. This code was just extra check for older
kernels- if IOs returned to SCSI mid layer by driver with DID_RESET status
does not check updated can_queue value(not sure if it was always taken
care of so added this code).
>
> > +
> > cmd = megasas_get_cmd_fusion(instance, scmd->request->tag);
> >
> > index = cmd->index;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-28 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-18 13:26 [PATCH 00/15] megaraid_sas: Updates for scsi-next Sumit Saxena
2015-12-18 13:26 ` [PATCH 01/15] megaraid_sas: Do not allow PCI access during OCR Sumit Saxena
2016-01-11 17:02 ` Tomas Henzl
2015-12-18 13:26 ` [PATCH 02/15] megaraid_sas: MFI IO timeout handling Sumit Saxena
2016-01-11 17:02 ` Tomas Henzl
2015-12-18 13:26 ` [PATCH 03/15] megaraid_sas: Syncing request flags macro names with firmware Sumit Saxena
2016-01-11 17:03 ` Tomas Henzl
2015-12-18 13:26 ` [PATCH 04/15] megaraid_sas: Task management support Sumit Saxena
2016-01-11 17:03 ` Tomas Henzl
2016-01-14 12:04 ` Sumit Saxena
2015-12-18 13:26 ` [PATCH 05/15] megaraid_sas: Update device Queue depth based on interface type Sumit Saxena
2016-01-12 14:16 ` Tomas Henzl
2016-01-14 11:48 ` Sumit Saxena
2015-12-18 13:26 ` [PATCH 06/15] megaraid_sas: Fastpath region lock bypass Sumit Saxena
2016-01-12 14:44 ` Tomas Henzl
2015-12-18 13:27 ` [PATCH 07/15] megaraid_sas: Reply Descriptor Post Queue(RDPQ) support Sumit Saxena
2015-12-18 14:49 ` [PATCH] megaraid_sas: fix kzalloc-simple.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2015-12-18 14:49 ` [PATCH 07/15] megaraid_sas: Reply Descriptor Post Queue(RDPQ) support kbuild test robot
2016-01-14 17:38 ` Tomas Henzl
2016-01-27 18:15 ` Sumit Saxena
2015-12-18 13:27 ` [PATCH 08/15] megaraid_sas: Code optimization build_and_issue_cmd return-type Sumit Saxena
2016-01-14 18:05 ` Tomas Henzl
2015-12-18 13:27 ` [PATCH 09/15] megaraid_sas: Dual Queue depth support Sumit Saxena
2016-01-19 13:34 ` Tomas Henzl
2016-01-19 13:44 ` Sumit Saxena
2016-01-20 13:55 ` Tomas Henzl
2016-01-20 14:09 ` Sumit Saxena
2016-01-20 14:16 ` Tomas Henzl
2016-01-20 15:08 ` Sumit Saxena
2016-01-20 16:00 ` Tomas Henzl
2016-01-27 2:02 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-01-27 7:09 ` Sumit Saxena
2015-12-18 13:27 ` [PATCH 10/15] megaraid_sas: IO throttling support Sumit Saxena
2016-01-19 13:38 ` Tomas Henzl
2016-01-28 7:18 ` Sumit Saxena [this message]
2015-12-18 13:27 ` [PATCH 11/15] megaraid_sas: Make adprecovery variable atomic Sumit Saxena
2016-01-19 13:52 ` Tomas Henzl
2016-01-28 8:30 ` Sumit Saxena
2015-12-18 13:27 ` [PATCH 12/15] megaraid_sas: MFI adapter's OCR changes Sumit Saxena
2016-01-19 14:22 ` Tomas Henzl
2016-01-28 11:12 ` Sumit Saxena
2015-12-18 13:27 ` [PATCH 13/15] megaraid_sas: Introduce module parameter for SCSI command-timeout Sumit Saxena
2016-01-19 14:57 ` Tomas Henzl
2016-01-28 11:17 ` Sumit Saxena
2015-12-18 13:27 ` [PATCH 14/15] megaraid_sas: SPERC OCR changes Sumit Saxena
2016-01-19 15:14 ` Tomas Henzl
2015-12-18 13:27 ` [PATCH 15/15] megaraid_sas: SPERC boot driver reorder Sumit Saxena
2015-12-18 14:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-08 7:07 ` Sumit Saxena
2016-01-12 5:26 ` Sumit Saxena
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75f584b953b9ad3a901011e049e3715e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sumit.saxena@avagotech.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@avagotech.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=thenzl@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).