From: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Ewan D . Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
Sathya Prakash Veerichetty <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH V4 2/2] scsi: core: don't limit per-LUN queue depth for SSD
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75fd79dc441f2100719c545110ec9aa2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75fe51d7-714f-8a51-89b5-aeeb7d318fdc@acm.org>
> On 10/9/19 2:32 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > @@ -354,7 +354,8 @@ void scsi_device_unbusy(struct scsi_device *sdev,
> struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> > if (starget->can_queue > 0)
> > atomic_dec(&starget->target_busy);
> >
> > - atomic_dec(&sdev->device_busy);
> > + if (!blk_queue_nonrot(sdev->request_queue))
> > + atomic_dec(&sdev->device_busy);
> > }
> >
>
> Hi Ming,
>
> Does this patch impact the meaning of the queue_depth sysfs attribute (see
> also sdev_store_queue_depth()) and also the queue depth ramp up/down
> mechanism (see also scsi_handle_queue_ramp_up())? Have you considered to
> enable/disable busy tracking per LUN depending on whether or not sdev-
> >queue_depth < shost->can_queue?
>
> The megaraid and mpt3sas drivers read sdev->device_busy directly. Is the
> current version of this patch compatible with these drivers?
We need to know per scsi device outstanding in mpt3sas and megaraid_sas
driver.
Can we get supporting API from block layer (through SML) ? something
similar to "atomic_read(&hctx->nr_active)" which can be derived from
sdev->request_queue->hctx ?
At least for those driver which is nr_hw_queue = 1, it will be useful and we
can avoid sdev->device_busy dependency.
Kashyap
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-17 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-09 9:32 [PATCH V4 0/2] scsi: avoid atomic operations in IO path Ming Lei
2019-10-09 9:32 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] scsi: core: avoid host-wide host_busy counter for scsi_mq Ming Lei
2019-10-09 16:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-23 8:52 ` John Garry
2019-10-24 0:58 ` Ming Lei
2019-10-24 9:19 ` John Garry
2019-10-24 21:24 ` Ming Lei
2019-10-25 8:58 ` John Garry
2019-10-25 9:43 ` Ming Lei
2019-10-25 10:13 ` John Garry
2019-10-25 21:53 ` Ming Lei
2019-10-28 9:42 ` John Garry
2019-10-09 9:32 ` [RFC PATCH V4 2/2] scsi: core: don't limit per-LUN queue depth for SSD Ming Lei
2019-10-09 16:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-10 0:43 ` Ming Lei
2019-10-17 18:30 ` Kashyap Desai [this message]
2019-10-23 1:28 ` Ming Lei
2019-10-23 7:46 ` Kashyap Desai
2019-10-24 1:09 ` Ming Lei
2019-10-25 10:04 ` Kashyap Desai
2019-10-25 21:58 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-04 9:30 ` Kashyap Desai
2019-11-05 0:23 ` Ming Lei
2019-10-23 0:30 ` [scsi] cc2f854c79: suspend_stress.fail kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75fd79dc441f2100719c545110ec9aa2@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=sathya.prakash@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox