From: Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
To: emilne@redhat.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Permanently change thin provisioning method from user space?
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 07:06:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7958058d-a649-e149-bf6e-efe2b0b5432f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1498597291.10198.21.camel@localhost.localdomain>
28.06.2017 00:01, Ewan D. Milne пишет:
> On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 14:02 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> I'm facing storage system that while generally advertising support for
>> WRITE_SAME_16 with UNMAP in reality fails this request depending on
>> exact volume configuration. This configuration is done on storage side
>> and may happen after host initially discovered LUN.
>>
>> I though about simply overriding kernel auto-detect with UNMAP using
>> sysfs scsi_disk/.../provisioning_mode attribute, but it appears kernel
>> may re-evaluate it in some cases, so changes do not stick. Is it
>> possible to permanently restrict it per-device (or per-vendor/device)?
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> -andrei
>
> sd_fops->revalidate_disk() will cause the properties that cause the
> provisioning_mode to be evaluated to be re-read, and sd_config_discard()
> to set the determined mode. We might want to re-think this, since the
> user overrode what was probed earlier. However, we might also want to
> automatically handle the storage capabilities changing, so I'm not sure.
>
Will revalidate_disk() emit "change" event? If yes, it can be handled by
udev rule (although small race window probably will still exist).
> I think we should figure out how best to handle devices/arrays that aren't
> correctly handling WRITE SAME(16) w/UNMAP,
In this case it caused total multipath outage because it tried DISCARD
on every path and failed all of them in turn.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-28 4:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-27 11:02 Permanently change thin provisioning method from user space? Andrei Borzenkov
2017-06-27 21:01 ` Ewan D. Milne
2017-06-28 1:05 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-06-28 4:06 ` Andrei Borzenkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7958058d-a649-e149-bf6e-efe2b0b5432f@gmail.com \
--to=arvidjaar@gmail.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox