From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com
Cc: hare@suse.de, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com,
ipylypiv@google.com, changyuanl@google.com, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] scsi: pm8001: Remove pm8001_tag_init()
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 11:13:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8163fce3-5ecb-193d-bec7-abca704e9e07@opensource.wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1664368034-114991-4-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
On 9/28/22 21:27, John Garry wrote:
> From: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@google.com>
>
> In commit 5a141315ed7c ("scsi: pm80xx: Increase the number of outstanding
> I/O supported to 1024") the pm8001_ha->tags allocation was moved into
> pm8001_init_ccb_tag(). This changed the execution order of allocation.
> pm8001_tag_init() used to be called after the pm8001_ha->tags allocation
> and now it is called before the allocation.
>
> Before:
>
> pm8001_pci_probe()
> `--> pm8001_pci_alloc()
> `--> pm8001_alloc()
> `--> pm8001_ha->tags = kzalloc(...)
> `--> pm8001_tag_init(pm8001_ha); // OK: tags are allocated
>
> After:
>
> pm8001_pci_probe()
> `--> pm8001_pci_alloc()
> | `--> pm8001_alloc()
> | `--> pm8001_tag_init(pm8001_ha); // NOK: tags are not allocated
> |
> `--> pm8001_init_ccb_tag()
> `--> pm8001_ha->tags = kzalloc(...) // today it is bitmap_zalloc()
>
> Since pm8001_ha->tags_num is zero when pm8001_tag_init() is called it does
> nothing. Tags memory is allocated with bitmap_zalloc() so there is no need
> to manually clear each bit with pm8001_tag_free().
>
> Reviewed-by: Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c | 2 --
> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c | 7 -------
> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
> index a0028e130a7e..0edc9857a8bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
> @@ -436,8 +436,6 @@ static int pm8001_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
> atomic_set(&pm8001_ha->devices[i].running_req, 0);
> }
> pm8001_ha->flags = PM8001F_INIT_TIME;
> - /* Initialize tags */
> - pm8001_tag_init(pm8001_ha);
> return 0;
>
> err_out_nodev:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
> index d5ec29f69be3..066dfa9f4683 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
> @@ -96,13 +96,6 @@ int pm8001_tag_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 *tag_out)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -void pm8001_tag_init(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> -{
> - int i;
> - for (i = 0; i < pm8001_ha->tags_num; ++i)
> - pm8001_tag_free(pm8001_ha, i);
> -}
> -
> /**
> * pm8001_mem_alloc - allocate memory for pm8001.
> * @pdev: pci device.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
> index 8ab0654327f9..9acaadf02150 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
> @@ -632,7 +632,6 @@ extern struct workqueue_struct *pm8001_wq;
>
> /******************** function prototype *********************/
> int pm8001_tag_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 *tag_out);
> -void pm8001_tag_init(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha);
> u32 pm8001_get_ncq_tag(struct sas_task *task, u32 *tag);
> void pm8001_ccb_task_free(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
> struct pm8001_ccb_info *ccb);
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-29 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-28 12:27 [PATCH 0/6] scsi: libsas: Use request tag in more drivers John Garry
2022-09-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] scsi: libsas: Add sas_task_find_rq() John Garry
2022-09-28 13:13 ` Jason Yan
2022-09-28 13:50 ` John Garry
2022-09-28 14:38 ` Jason Yan
2022-09-28 13:17 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-09-28 13:56 ` John Garry
2022-09-28 14:28 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-09-29 2:09 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-09-29 7:33 ` John Garry
2022-09-29 7:56 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-09-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] scsi: hisi_sas: Use sas_task_find_rq() John Garry
2022-09-29 2:11 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-09-29 7:38 ` John Garry
2022-09-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] scsi: pm8001: Remove pm8001_tag_init() John Garry
2022-09-29 2:13 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2022-09-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] scsi: pm8001: Use sas_task_find_rq() for tagging John Garry
2022-09-29 2:17 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-09-29 7:41 ` John Garry
2022-09-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] scsi: mvsas: Delete mvs_tag_init() John Garry
2022-09-29 2:18 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-09-28 12:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] scsi: mvsas: Use sas_task_find_rq() for tagging John Garry
2022-09-29 2:22 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-09-29 7:49 ` John Garry
2022-09-29 8:02 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8163fce3-5ecb-193d-bec7-abca704e9e07@opensource.wdc.com \
--to=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=changyuanl@google.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=ipylypiv@google.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox