Re: [PATCH] dpt_i2o: Add PROC_IA64 define

[Mark Salyzyn <Mark_Salyzyn@adaptec.com>]

NAK, the management tools need to see the processor as manufactured by  
Intel.

Leave PROC_INTAL, PROC_IA64 in the second fragment.

Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn

On Jun 12, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Jeff Mahoney wrote:

> This fixes the following compile failure in 2.6.26-rc5-git5:
> drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c:83: error: 'PROC_IA64' undeclared here (not  
> in a function)
>
> I'm not sure if these values are magic and defined somewhere, but the
> kernel wouldn't build on IA64 without it.
>
> I changed the value in dpt_i2o.c because the comments indicated that
> PROC_INTEL refered to the 80x86 family, which doesn't include ia64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/dpt/dptsig.h |    1 +
> drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c    |    2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/scsi/dpt/dptsig.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/dpt/dptsig.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ typedef unsigned int sigINT;
> #define PROC_POWERPC    0x04    /* IBM Power PC */
> #define PROC_i960       0x05    /* Intel i960 */
> #define PROC_ULTRASPARC 0x06    /* SPARC processor */
> +#define PROC_IA64       0x07    /* IA64 processor */
>
> /* Specific Minimim Processor - sigBYTE dsProcessor;    FLAG BITS */
> /*  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------ */
> --- a/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static dpt_sig_S DPTI_sig = {
> #ifdef __i386__
>        PROC_INTEL, PROC_386 | PROC_486 | PROC_PENTIUM | PROC_SEXIUM,
> #elif defined(__ia64__)
> -       PROC_INTEL, PROC_IA64,
> +       PROC_IA64, PROC_IA64,
> #elif defined(__sparc__)
>        PROC_ULTRASPARC, PROC_ULTRASPARC,
> #elif defined(__alpha__)
>
> --
> Jeff Mahoney
> SUSE Labs
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux- 
> scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html