From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Pekka Enberg" Subject: Re: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:47:24 +0200 Message-ID: <84144f020901190047v1f7f6710l5d4af50b57be3a7e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1232352303.30141.25.camel@penberg-laptop> <200901191933.29322.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <200901191942.48548.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:61510 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751520AbZASIr1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:47:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200901191942.48548.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Nick Piggin Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton , "Wilcox, Matthew R" , chinang.ma@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sharad.c.tripathi@intel.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, andi.kleen@intel.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, harita.chilukuri@intel.com, douglas.w.styner@intel.com, peter.xihong.wang@intel.com, hubert.nueckel@intel.com, chris.mason@oracle.com, srostedt@redhat.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Vasquez , Anirban Chakraborty , Christoph Lameter On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Nick Piggin wrote: > Anyway, nobody has disagreed with my proposal to merge SLQB, so in the > worst case I don't think it will cause too much harm, and in the best > case it might turn out to make the best tradeoffs and who knows, it > might actually not be catastrophic for HPC ;) Yeah. If Andrew/Linus doesn't want to merge SLQB to 2.6.29, we can stick it in linux-next through slab.git if you want. Pekka