Re: [PATCH 102/117] ufs: Convert to the scsi_status union

Bart Van Assche
2021-05-07T03:35:26Z

On 5/6/21 5:09 PM, Can Guo wrote:
> Thanks for the change, do you miss ufshcd_send_request_sense()?

Hi Can,

That's a good question. I can change the type of the
ufshcd_send_request_sense() return value but I'm not sure whether it's
worth it since that function only has one caller and that caller does
not care about the subcomponents of the SCSI status value. All it cares
about is whether or not ufshcd_send_request_sense() returns 0.

Thanks,

Bart.