From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A607C48BDF for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 23:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B7B6136E for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 23:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232206AbhFMXQ1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 19:16:27 -0400 Received: from icebox.esperi.org.uk ([81.187.191.129]:40072 "EHLO mail.esperi.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232184AbhFMXQZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 19:16:25 -0400 Received: from loom (nix@sidle.srvr.nix [192.168.14.8]) by mail.esperi.org.uk (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 15DNEKx9008385 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:14:21 +0100 From: Nix To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Khalid Aziz , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH v2 0/5] Bring the BusLogic host bus adapter driver up to Y2021 References: Emacs: The Awakening Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:14:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Maciej W. Rozycki's message of "Fri, 11 Jun 2021 01:25:36 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: <874ke1pdbn.fsf@esperi.org.uk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-DCC-wuwien-Metrics: loom 1290; Body=7 Fuz1=7 Fuz2=7 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 11 Jun 2021, Maciej W. Rozycki said: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2021, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > >> Questions, comments, concerns? Otherwise please apply. > > Ping for: > > . > > Where are we with this patch series? I can see it's been archived in > patchwork in the new state. With the unexpected serial device fixes which > preempted me and which I've just posted, moving them off the table I now > have some spare cycles to get back here, but I'm not sure what to do. > > Nix was kind enough to verify and tell me off-list that 5/5 still works > correctly with his system that required the earlier change referred there > and the need for which was not completely understood back then -- Nix, are > you OK with adding a `Tested-by' tag for your verification? Sure, as long as I don't have to verify it again, because the loft is a superheated pollen hell right now and I am not going up there unless it actually catches fire or something :) If that needs an actual name, like S-o-b, you can use Tested-by: Nick Alcock