From: "Peter Wang (王信友)" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>
To: "bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
"nitin.rawat@oss.qualcomm.com" <nitin.rawat@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"avri.altman@sandisk.com" <avri.altman@sandisk.com>,
"James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com" <quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com>,
"adrian.hunter@intel.com" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for rc] ufs: core: Configure MCQ after link startup
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 07:32:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877f7704215c36bfb15808e3a168767845ce09c4.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251218230741.2661049-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
On Thu, 2025-12-18 at 15:07 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Commit f46b9a595fa9 ("scsi: ufs: core: Allocate the SCSI host
> earlier")
> did not only cause scsi_add_host() to be called earlier. It also
> swapped
> the order of link startup and enabling and configuring MCQ mode.
> Before
> that commit, the call chains for link startup and enabling MCQ were
> as
> follows:
>
> ufshcd_init()
> ufshcd_link_startup()
> ufshcd_add_scsi_host()
> ufshcd_mcq_enable()
>
> Apparently this change causes link startup to fail. Fix this by
> configuring
> MCQ after link startup has completed.
>
> Reported-by: Nitin Rawat <nitin.rawat@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Fixes: f46b9a595fa9 ("scsi: ufs: core: Allocate the SCSI host
> earlier")
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Hi Bart,
It seems strange to me that ufshcd_mcq_enable is called before
ufshcd_link_startup.
In driver development, configuration (config) should generally
be done before enabling (enable) the hardware.
Reason:
Configuring first ensures the hardware operates correctly and
avoids unexpected behavior or safety issues.
Typical steps:
1. Set registers/parameters
2. Initialize resources
3. Configure interrupts/DMA
4. Enable the hardware
So, do you also consider moving ufshcd_mcq_enable after
ufshcd_config_mcq?
Thanks.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-19 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-18 23:07 [PATCH for rc] ufs: core: Configure MCQ after link startup Bart Van Assche
2025-12-19 7:32 ` Peter Wang (王信友) [this message]
2025-12-19 16:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-12-22 5:55 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2026-01-04 21:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877f7704215c36bfb15808e3a168767845ce09c4.camel@mediatek.com \
--to=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=avri.altman@sandisk.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=nitin.rawat@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox