From: Dave Marquardt <davemarq@linux.ibm.com>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 03/11] scsi: ibmvfc: fix potential NULL pointer dereference on failed queue allocation
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 11:15:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cxtbc54a.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-173054@kernel.org> (sashiko-bot@kernel.org's message of "Thu, 15 Oct 2026 15:20:49 +0000")
sashiko-bot@kernel.org writes:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Low] scsi: ibmvfc: Build failure due to un-guarded KUnit visibility macros
> --
>
> commit 79ff3803bf62c41db84d726eab4c3cdbd582546c
> Author: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
>
> scsi: ibmvfc: fix potential NULL pointer dereference on failed queue allocation
>
> This commit guards ibmvfc_deregister_channel() against operating on unallocated
> queues and exposes it for KUnit testing. It also adds a new KUnit test module
> for the IBM POWER Virtual FC Client.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c
>> index 145d559041f12..0fe6b6f4260ba 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> -static void ibmvfc_deregister_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost,
>> +/**
>> + * ibmvfc_deregister_channel - Deregister a sub-CRQ channel with the hypervisor
>> + * @vhost: ibmvfc host struct
>> + * @channels: ibmvfc channels struct containing the sub-CRQ array
>> + * @index: index into the sub-CRQ array
>> + *
>> + * Frees the IRQ, disposes of the IRQ mapping, and calls H_FREE_SUB_CRQ to
>> + * release the sub-CRQ with the hypervisor. On success the queue message
>> + * buffer is zeroed and the current index is reset. If H_FREE_SUB_CRQ fails,
>> + * an error is logged but the channel resources are cleaned up regardless.
>> + */
>> +VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT void ibmvfc_deregister_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost,
>> struct ibmvfc_channels *channels,
>> int index)
>> {
>
> [Severity: Low]
> Does this cause a build failure when CONFIG_KUNIT is disabled?
>
> Since <kunit/visibility.h> is only included conditionally in ibmvfc.h under
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT), won't the unconditional use of VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
> here (and EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT below) result in syntax errors during a
> standard build without KUnit?
No, this is not a problem. The only code that calls
ibmvfc_deregister_channel(), which is defined in ibmvfc-core.c, is also
in ibmvfc-core.c in the case where CONFIG_KUNIT is not defined. I've
cleared CONFIG_KUNIT in my config, run "make clean", and built the
kernel, and there were no errors.
> [ ... ]
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.h b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.h
>> index ca80ceffe53a5..421ce8bc3ea33 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.h
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT)
>> +#include <kunit/visibility.h>
>> +VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT void ibmvfc_deregister_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost,
>> + struct ibmvfc_channels *channels,
>> + int index);
>> +VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT struct ibmvfc_host *ibmvfc_get_first_vhost(void);
>> +#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 15:06 [PATCH v14 00/11] scsi: ibmvfc: make ibmvfc support FPIN messages Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 15:07 ` [PATCH v14 01/11] scsi: ibmvfc: fix IRQ leak and guard deregister on channel reg failure Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 15:07 ` [PATCH v14 02/11] scsi: ibmvfc: fix potential clobbering of rc after failed irq setup Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 15:07 ` [PATCH v14 03/11] scsi: ibmvfc: fix potential NULL pointer dereference on failed queue allocation Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 15:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 16:15 ` Dave Marquardt [this message]
2026-10-15 15:07 ` [PATCH v14 04/11] scsi: ibmvfc: add basic FPIN support Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 15:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 15:07 ` [PATCH v14 05/11] scsi: ibmvfc: add NOOP command support Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 15:07 ` [PATCH v14 06/11] scsi: ibmvfc: add FPIN extended flag and async sub-CRQ queue handle Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 15:07 ` [PATCH v14 07/11] scsi: ibmvfc: extend async event handlers for async sub-CRQ events Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 15:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 15:07 ` [PATCH v14 08/11] scsi: ibmvfc: add interrupt routine for asynchronous sub CRQ Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 15:07 ` [PATCH v14 09/11] scsi: ibmvfc: extend channel reg/dereg helpers for async sub-CRQ Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 15:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 15:07 ` [PATCH v14 10/11] scsi: ibmvfc: register and use asynchronous sub CRQ for events Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 15:07 ` [PATCH v14 11/11] scsi: ibmvfc: handle extended FPIN events Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cxtbc54a.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=davemarq@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox