From: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@gmail.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [multipath] SCSI device capacity mess
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:34:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87f94c3704102713343d6b204f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1098908346.12464.44.camel@zezette>
> I just consider it annoying for the HSG80 / HSV* family
> controlers :
>
<snip>
> - Either way, these controler families are *not* high-end devices,
> whatever the criteria (capacity, throughput, cache, alarming, ...). The
> whole ghost-path notion being the best evidence.
>
HP will not agree with "not high-end devices". The HSV line in
particular is a very good performing system and is designed to compete
with the EMC Symmetrix line.
The EVA (HSV based) is definately targeted at Data Centers with lots
of servers using it as back-end storage simultaneously.
Greg
--
Greg Freemyer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-27 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-26 23:27 [multipath] SCSI device capacity mess christophe varoqui
2004-10-26 21:34 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-26 21:46 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-27 8:17 ` [dm-devel] " Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-27 8:42 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-27 18:51 ` Bryan Henderson
2004-10-29 14:12 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-29 16:48 ` Bryan Henderson
2004-10-27 19:02 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-27 19:37 ` Eddie Williams
2004-10-27 20:19 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-27 20:34 ` Greg Freemyer [this message]
2004-10-27 20:28 ` Philip R Auld
2004-10-27 21:57 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-28 11:37 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-28 18:14 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-28 18:21 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-30 0:41 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-30 1:01 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-30 7:21 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-30 8:22 ` christophe varoqui
2004-11-02 15:23 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-28 11:35 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87f94c3704102713343d6b204f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=greg.freemyer@gmail.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).