From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Freemyer Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [multipath] SCSI device capacity mess Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:34:23 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <87f94c3704102713343d6b204f@mail.gmail.com> References: <1098833278.4914.24.camel@zezette> <20041027081713.GC32712@marowsky-bree.de> <1098903759.12464.32.camel@zezette> <1098905875.4472.92.camel@gator.sc.steeleye.com> <1098908346.12464.44.camel@zezette> Reply-To: Greg Freemyer Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.197]:2375 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262701AbUJ0UeX (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:34:23 -0400 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so368331wri for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:34:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1098908346.12464.44.camel@zezette> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: device-mapper development Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" > I just consider it annoying for the HSG80 / HSV* family > controlers : > > - Either way, these controler families are *not* high-end devices, > whatever the criteria (capacity, throughput, cache, alarming, ...). The > whole ghost-path notion being the best evidence. > HP will not agree with "not high-end devices". The HSV line in particular is a very good performing system and is designed to compete with the EMC Symmetrix line. The EVA (HSV based) is definately targeted at Data Centers with lots of servers using it as back-end storage simultaneously. Greg -- Greg Freemyer