From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
To: 239952@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:33:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lllobg5t.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40636302.6080807@stesmi.com> (Stefan Smietanowski's message of "Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:53:54 +0100")
Stefan writes:
> Except the firmware itself is GPL in this case.
So the problem is not GPL compatibility: it's GPL code being distributed
without source. Can we get written permission from the manufacturer?
Without either source or written permission to do without we cannot
redistribute.
Note that the GPL does not require that the firmware build from source on
Linux. We are not obligated (by the GPL) to supply a compiler.
--
John Hasler You may treat this work as if it
john@dhh.gt.org were in the public domain.
Dancing Horse Hill I waive all rights.
Elmwood, Wisconsin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-26 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1B6Izr-0002Ai-00@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
[not found] ` <20040325082949.GA3376@gondor.apana.org.au>
2004-03-25 22:08 ` Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL? Adrian Bunk
2004-03-25 22:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-03-25 22:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-03-25 22:53 ` Bug#239952: " Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-26 0:33 ` John Hasler [this message]
2004-03-26 0:17 ` David Woodhouse
2004-03-26 1:30 ` John Hasler
2004-03-26 8:50 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-26 9:43 ` Bug#239952: " Dumitru Ciobarcianu
2004-03-26 10:14 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-26 0:33 ` Bug#239952: " Matthew Wilcox
2004-03-26 1:07 ` GOTO Masanori
2004-03-26 1:39 ` John Hasler
2004-03-26 2:06 ` David Schwartz
2004-03-26 2:59 ` Chris Cheney
2004-03-26 3:23 ` John Hasler
2004-03-26 8:53 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-26 9:12 ` John Bradford
2004-03-26 13:59 ` John Hasler
2004-03-27 9:19 ` John Bradford
2004-03-25 22:54 ` Chris Cheney
2004-03-26 0:41 ` David Schwartz
2004-03-26 9:09 ` John Bradford
2004-03-26 13:16 ` Eduard Bloch
2004-03-26 14:19 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-26 14:29 ` Eduard Bloch
2004-03-26 14:38 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-26 14:55 ` Eduard Bloch
2004-03-26 15:03 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-26 15:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-03-26 15:22 ` Guy
2004-03-26 21:57 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-03-30 11:39 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-30 14:02 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-30 18:11 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2004-04-02 20:53 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] <8RnZwD.A.91B.qHYaAB@murphy>
2004-03-30 14:57 ` Humberto Massa
2004-03-30 16:51 ` Henning Makholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lllobg5t.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org \
--to=john@dhh.gt.org \
--cc=239952@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=debian-devel@lists.debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox