From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] libata-scsi: do not response with "invalid field" for FORMAT UNIT Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 00:31:57 +0300 Message-ID: <8d592104-be11-151f-a3e7-78e506879175@cogentembedded.com> References: <20160704205335.5484-1-me> <577accda.46c0620a.65070.ffffec86@mx.google.com> <2c7e733e-a714-609e-d71e-9d5f4e81b44b@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:33973 "EHLO mail-lf0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753568AbcGDVcB (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2016 17:32:01 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f46.google.com with SMTP id h129so123639696lfh.1 for ; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 14:32:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2c7e733e-a714-609e-d71e-9d5f4e81b44b@cogentembedded.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: tom.ty89@gmail.com, tj@kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 07/05/2016 12:27 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >> From: Tom Yan >> >> It does not make sense and is confusing to response with "Invalid > > Respond here and in the subject. > >> field in cbd" while we have no support at all implemented for CDB. >> FORMAT UNIT. It is decent to let it go to the default, which >> will response with "Invalid command operation code" instead. >> Respond again. >> Signed-off-by: Tom Yan [...] MBR, Sergei