From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Maciej Rutecki" Subject: Re: [Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc2] Write protect on on Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:02:07 +0200 Message-ID: <8db1092f0806140002x70629f05xdbefbe1c1c80d77@mail.gmail.com> References: <8db1092f0806130957r22bf02a4pd5138f67f4ac56dd@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.173]:33672 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751839AbYFNHCH (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:02:07 -0400 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so4430109wfd.4 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:02:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Stern Cc: Jens Axboe , Boaz Harrosh , James Bottomley , USB Storage list , SCSI development list 2008/6/13 Alan Stern : [...] > > That patch wasn't meant to help; it wasn't complete. It was meant to > stimulate conversation -- and clearly it failed. > > Below is a complete patch. It's very ugly and isn't likely to get > accepted, but maybe it will convince people to start talking about the > problem. Maybe it will offend people's sensibilities so that they will > just _have_ to chime in, if only to complain about how bad the patch > is... [...] Tested with 2.6.26-rc2 and works fine. Thanks. -- Maciej Rutecki http://www.maciek.unixy.pl