From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [USB] Use normalized sense when emulating autosense
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <927255.77335.qm@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1010221726530.4510-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Reply-To: ltuikov@yahoo.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1010221726530.4510-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org

--- On Fri, 10/22/10, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Yeah, the new one is better.=A0 I would have preferred
> to see fm_ili=20
> explained in a comment, but this is okay.

Thanks. I tried to preserve the logic and the comments as much as possi=
ble and tried not to introduce neither additional comment nor additiona=
l logic. Is this an implicit ACK then? Or does Greg needs an explicit o=
ne?  Will he or I have to ask for an explicit ACK? From whom else?