From: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>, Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 19/20] scsi: ufs: Implement polling support
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 16:40:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <952443760df360b48a153c01b1dad957cd82fdea.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <deeb660e-d1ef-7a54-6221-45cfebd87881@acm.org>
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 06:26 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/30/21 12:43 AM, Bean Huo wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-11-19 at 11:57 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > On my test setup this patch increases IOPS from 2736 to 22000
> > > (8x)
> > > for the
> > > following test:
> > >
> > > for hipri in 0 1; do
> > > fio --ioengine=io_uring --iodepth=1 --rw=randread \
> > > --runtime=60 --time_based=1 --direct=1 --name=qd1 \
> > > --filename=/dev/block/sda --ioscheduler=none --gtod_reduce=1
> > > \
> > > --norandommap --hipri=$hipri
> > > done
> >
> > For 4KB random read, direct IO, and iodepth=1, we did not see an
> > improvement in IOPS due to this patch. Maybe the test case above is
> > not
> > sufficient.
>
> Hi Bean,
>
> Which test has been run? Polling is only enabled if --hipri=1 is
> specified
> to fio and --ioengine=io_uring is the only I/O engine on Android that
> supports
> that flag.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Hi Bart,
It is the test case in your commit message. If iodepth=1, there is no
performance improvement. Increase the io-depth to multiple, for
example, let iodepth= CPU core counter. I see that the interrupt
overhead is significantly increased when the request is completed, so
IO_polling will win compared to the interrupt mode.
Kind regards,
Bean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-30 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-19 19:57 [PATCH v2 00/20] UFS patches for kernel v5.17 Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] block: Add a flag for internal commands Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22 8:46 ` John Garry
2021-11-22 17:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] scsi: core: Unexport scsi_track_queue_full() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] scsi: core: Fix scsi_device_max_queue_depth() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] scsi: core: Fix a race between scsi_done() and scsi_times_out() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] scsi: core: Add support for internal commands Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22 8:58 ` John Garry
2021-11-22 17:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22 18:08 ` John Garry
2021-11-22 19:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-23 8:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-11-23 17:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-23 19:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-24 6:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] scsi: core: Add support for reserved tags Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22 8:15 ` John Garry
2021-11-22 17:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22 18:13 ` John Garry
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] scsi: ufs: Rename a function argument Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22 20:25 ` Bean Huo
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] scsi: ufs: Remove is_rpmb_wlun() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] scsi: ufs: Remove the sdev_rpmb member Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] scsi: ufs: Remove dead code Bart Van Assche
2021-11-24 11:11 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-29 19:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] scsi: ufs: Switch to scsi_(get|put)_internal_cmd() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-23 12:20 ` Bean Huo
2021-11-23 17:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-23 19:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-24 18:18 ` Bean Huo
2021-11-24 11:02 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-24 11:15 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-29 19:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30 6:41 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-30 17:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30 19:15 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-30 19:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] scsi: ufs: Rework ufshcd_change_queue_depth() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] scsi: ufs: Fix a deadlock in the error handler Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30 8:54 ` Bean Huo
2021-11-30 17:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30 19:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-12-01 13:44 ` Bean Huo
2021-12-01 18:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] scsi: ufs: Introduce ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-24 12:03 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-30 18:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30 19:02 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-30 19:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] scsi: ufs: Improve SCSI abort handling Bart Van Assche
2021-11-24 12:28 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-30 4:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] scsi: ufs: Fix a kernel crash during shutdown Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] scsi: ufs: Stop using the clock scaling lock in the error handler Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] scsi: ufs: Optimize the command queueing code Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22 17:46 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-11-22 18:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22 23:02 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-11-22 23:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-23 18:24 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-12-01 18:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] scsi: ufs: Implement polling support Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30 8:43 ` Bean Huo
2021-11-30 8:57 ` Avri Altman
2021-11-30 9:15 ` Bean Huo
2021-11-30 14:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30 15:40 ` Bean Huo [this message]
2021-11-30 17:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30 17:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] scsi: ufs: Fix race conditions related to driver data Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=952443760df360b48a153c01b1dad957cd82fdea.camel@gmail.com \
--to=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox