From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sinan Kaya Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] PCI/portdrv: do not disable device on reboot/shutdown Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 09:30:59 -0400 Message-ID: <984b9734-244d-04e9-946f-7524f148ff7c@codeaurora.org> References: <1527043490-17268-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20180523213249.GD150632@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <61f70fd6-52fd-da07-ce73-303f95132131@codeaurora.org> <20180524183502.GB85822@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180524183502.GB85822@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, ryan@finnie.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , Kate Stewart , Frederick Lawler , Dongdong Liu , Mika Westerberg , open list , Don Brace , esc.storagedev@microsemi.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 5/24/2018 2:35 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > That sounds like a reasonable idea, and it is definitely another can > of worms. I looked briefly at some of the .shutdown() cases: should we throw it into 4.18 and see what happens? -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.