public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: mark HPB support as BROKEN
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:36:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <99641481-523a-e5a9-db48-dac2b547b4bd@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211026071204.1709318-1-hch@lst.de>

On 10/26/21 12:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The HPB support added this merge window is fundanetally flawed as it
                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                              fundanetally -> fundamentally

Since the implementation can be reworked not to use
blk_insert_cloned_request() I'm not sure using the word "fundamentally"
is appropriate.

> uses blk_insert_cloned_request to insert a cloned request onto the same
> queue as the one that the original request came from, leading to all
> kinds of issues in blk-mq accounting (in addition to this API being
> a special case for dm-mpath that should not see other users).

More detailed information would have been welcome.

> Fixes: f02bc9754a68 ("scsi: ufs: ufshpb: Introduce Host Performance Buffer
> feature")

I assume that you wanted to refer to commit 41d8a9333cc9 ("scsi: ufs: ufshpb:
Add HPB 2.0 support") instead since that commit is the only commit that
introduced a blk_insert_cloned_request() call in the UFS HPB code?

Bart.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-26 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-26  7:12 [PATCH] scsi: ufs: mark HPB support as BROKEN Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-26  7:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-10-26  7:24 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-10-26 13:04   ` James Bottomley
2021-10-26 16:36 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-10-26 17:19   ` James Bottomley
2021-10-26 17:25     ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-26 18:05       ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-26 18:10         ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-26 18:18           ` James Bottomley
2021-10-26 18:27             ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-10-26 20:10               ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-26 22:22                 ` Daejun Park
2021-10-27  5:27                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-27 12:20                   ` James Bottomley
2021-10-28 20:21                     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-28 20:33                       ` James Bottomley
2021-10-28 20:53                         ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-28 21:14                           ` Daejun Park
2021-10-27 13:16                   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-27 14:12                     ` Keith Busch
2021-10-27 14:38                       ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-27 14:43                         ` James Bottomley
2021-10-27 15:03                       ` Ming Lei
2021-10-27 15:06                         ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-27 15:16                           ` Ming Lei
2021-10-27 15:44                             ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-10-27 15:58                               ` Ming Lei
2021-10-27 16:16                                 ` Keith Busch
2021-10-27 16:19                                   ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-28  0:42                                   ` Ming Lei
2021-10-28  1:10                                     ` Daejun Park
2021-10-28  2:07                                       ` Ming Lei
2021-10-27 16:59                                 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-10-27 15:35                           ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-10-27 15:40                             ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-27 16:16                               ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-10-27 17:01                                 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-28  1:32                                   ` Ming Lei
2021-10-29 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-29 11:39   ` James Bottomley
2021-10-29 13:35     ` Avri Altman
2021-10-29 13:44       ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=99641481-523a-e5a9-db48-dac2b547b4bd@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox