From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ipr: work around fortify-string warning
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 16:27:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b335f88-a20a-83da-3ce1-df409e05004a@opensource.wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94b362b4-a30d-4b69-8126-a64f5d025740@app.fastmail.com>
On 2/14/23 16:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023, at 04:59, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 2/13/23 19:10, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
>>> **/
>>> -static int strip_and_pad_whitespace(int i, char *buf)
>>> +static void strip_whitespace(int i, char *buf)
>>> {
>>> while (i && buf[i] == ' ')
>>> i--;
>>> - buf[i+1] = ' ';
>>> - buf[i+2] = '\0';
>>> - return i + 2;
>>> + buf[i+1] = '\0';
>>
>> If i is now the size of the buffer, this is a buffer overflow, no ? And
>> the initial loop should start at "i - 1" I think...
>
> Right, I definitely have the wrong length here.
>
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
>>> @@ -1547,19 +1543,21 @@ static int strip_and_pad_whitespace(int i, char *buf)
>>> static void ipr_log_vpd_compact(char *prefix, struct ipr_hostrcb *hostrcb,
>>> struct ipr_vpd *vpd)
>>> {
>>> - char buffer[IPR_VENDOR_ID_LEN + IPR_PROD_ID_LEN + IPR_SERIAL_NUM_LEN + 3];
>>> - int i = 0;
>>> + char vendor_id[IPR_VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1];
>>
>> ...but the size is in fact "i + 1"... So in strip_whitespace(), i is the
>> index of the last possible character in the string, and given that the
>> string may be much shorter, that function may not actually strip
>> whitespaces after the string...
>
> I think aside from the off-by-one bug I introduced, this is not
> a (new) problem as the old code already assumed that the input
> is padded with spaces rather than nul-terminated.
Yeah. The HW probably always give the same amount of chars with short
strings completed by spaces...
>
>>> + char product_id[IPR_PROD_ID_LEN + 1];
>>> + char sn[IPR_SERIAL_NUM_LEN + 1];
>>>
>>> - memcpy(buffer, vpd->vpids.vendor_id, IPR_VENDOR_ID_LEN);
>>> - i = strip_and_pad_whitespace(IPR_VENDOR_ID_LEN - 1, buffer);
>>> + memcpy(vendor_id, vpd->vpids.vendor_id, IPR_VENDOR_ID_LEN);
>>> + strip_whitespace(IPR_VENDOR_ID_LEN, vendor_id);
>>
>> So this call should really be:
>>
>> strip_whitespace(strlen(vendor_id) - 1, vendor_id);
>>
>> Which means that this helper can be turned into:
>>
>> static void strip_whitespace(char *buf)
>> {
>> int i = strlen(buf) - 1;
>>
>> while (i > 0 && buf[i] == ' ')
>> i--;
>> buf[i+1] = '\0';
>> }
>>
>> Unless I am missing something :)
>
> The strlen() here requires the input to be a properly terminated string,
> so this would at least require adding a \0.
>
> Also, if the input is a short nul-terminated string instead of
> a space padded array, we probably don't need to strip the trailing
> whitespace, or at least the original version didn't either.
>
> Let me try to respin my patch with just the off-by-one error
> fixed but otherwise keeping the output of ipr_log_vpd_compact()
> unchanged.
>
> Arnd
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-14 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-13 10:10 [PATCH] scsi: ipr: work around fortify-string warning Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-14 3:59 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-14 7:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-14 7:27 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b335f88-a20a-83da-3ce1-df409e05004a@opensource.wdc.com \
--to=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox