From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Subhash Jadavani Subject: Re: UFS_MASK macro definition Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 20:21:02 -0800 Message-ID: <9df3b5fd8815719f7a8e8f717cc2edb4@codeaurora.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:33536 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757042AbcKXEVF (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2016 23:21:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Zhangfei Gao Cc: Vinayak Holikatti , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org On 2016-11-23 19:23, Zhangfei Gao wrote: > Hi, Vinayak > > Checked 4.9-rc6, and not find UFS_MASK macro definition. > Have find this patch from google, > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg58634.html > [PATCH 2/2] [SCSI] ufs: Add missing UFS_MASK macro definition > > Is this patch has been merged? Good catch. ufshci.h history shows that this was never merged. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h?id=refs/tags/v4.9-rc6 Zhangfei, do you want to take above patch and repost it to linux-scsi mailing list? You may keep the original author & signed-off intact and may add your signed-off. Thanks, Subhash > > There will be build error if some definition defined by UFS_MASK is > used. > Otherwise it may keep silent. > > Thanks > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" > in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project