From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "tester7 A." Subject: Re: QLA2300, Infortrand and LBD? Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:31:56 +0900 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from bay22-f25.bay22.hotmail.com ([64.4.16.75]:47623 "EHLO hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266462AbUFVAb5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:31:57 -0400 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James.Bottomley@steeleye.com Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, tech@storageone.co.kr I have sent the those 2 questions to the Infortrend. When I get the answer, I will get back to you. Thank you very much. >From: James Bottomley >To: "tester7 A." >CC: SCSI Mailing List , tech@storageone.co.kr >Subject: Re: QLA2300, Infortrand and LBD? >Date: 21 Jun 2004 09:09:44 -0500 > >On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 03:43, tester7 A. wrote: > > SCSI device sdc: 3022966784 512-byte hdwr sectors (1547759 MB) > > SCSI device sdc: drive cache: write through > > sdc: sdc1 > > Attached scsi disk sdc at scsi3, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 > >The drive itself replied with that capacity, which is incorrect. It's >supposed to reply with the largest possible capacity (0xffffffff) and we >use that as a signal to retry with READ_CAPACITY_16. > >Could you contact the support line of the array and make sure of two >things: > >1) It does actually support single LUNs with a capacity of >2TB (lots of >arrays don't) >2) And if 1) is true, why is it not responding correctly to the READ >CAPACITY(10)? The spec (spc-2 Rev 8, 5.2.11) says "If the number of >logical blocks exceeds the maximum value[...]the device server shall >transfer FFFFFFFFh in the RETURNED LOGICAL BLOCK ADDRESS field" > >James > > _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail