From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: janitor@sternwelten.at Subject: [patch 03/10] scsi/imm: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:47:00 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: Return-path: Received: from baikonur.stro.at ([213.239.196.228]:31142 "EHLO baikonur.stro.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270699AbUJUIrE (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 04:47:04 -0400 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, janitor@sternwelten.at, nacc@us.ibm.com Any comments would be appreciated. Description: Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task delays as expected. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems --- linux-2.6.9-max/drivers/scsi/imm.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN drivers/scsi/imm.c~msleep-drivers_scsi_imm drivers/scsi/imm.c --- linux-2.6.9/drivers/scsi/imm.c~msleep-drivers_scsi_imm 2004-10-21 02:41:27.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.9-max/drivers/scsi/imm.c 2004-10-21 02:41:27.000000000 +0200 @@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@ static int __imm_attach(struct parport * dev->waiting = &waiting; prepare_to_wait(&waiting, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); if (imm_pb_claim(dev)) - schedule_timeout(3 * HZ); + msleep(3000); if (dev->wanted) { printk(KERN_ERR "imm%d: failed to claim parport because " "a pardevice is owning the port for too long " _