public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in blk_recalc_rq_segments about VMERGE
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:50:24 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807170746001.31185@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080717131444K.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>

> > > Please give me an example how the boundary restriction of a device can
> > > break the VMERGE accounting and an IOMMU if you aren't still sure.
> > 
> > You have dma_get_seg_boundary and dma_get_max_seg_size. On sparc64, adding 
> > one of these broken VMERGE accounting (the VMERGE didn't happen past 64-kb 
> > boundary and bio layer thought that VMERGE would be possible).
> 
> If the device has 64KB boundary restriction, the device also has
> max_seg_size restriction of 64KB or under. So the vmerge acounting
> works (though we need to fix it to handle max_seg_size, as discussed).
> 
> > And if you fix this case, someone will break it again, sooner or later, by 
> > adding new restriction.
> 
> All restrictions that IOMMUs need to know are dma_get_seg_boundary and
> dma_get_max_seg_size.
> 
> What is your new restriction?

We don't know what happens in the future. And that is the problem that we 
don't know --- but we have two pieces of code (blk-merge and iommu) that 
try to calculate the same number (number of hw segments) and if they get 
different result, it will crash. If the calculations were done at one 
place, there would be no problem with that.

Mikulas

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-17 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-15 10:44 [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in blk_recalc_rq_segments about VMERGE FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-15 13:37 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-15 14:20   ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-15 14:37     ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-15 15:30       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-15 15:46         ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-16  0:34           ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-16 18:02             ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-17  4:14               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-17 11:50                 ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2008-07-17 13:18                   ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-17 13:27                     ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-07-17 13:56                       ` James Bottomley
2008-07-19  7:28                     ` David Miller
2008-07-20  1:45                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-20  2:17                         ` James Bottomley
2008-07-20  4:07                           ` David Miller
2008-07-20 14:52                             ` James Bottomley
2008-07-20 17:23                               ` David Miller
2008-07-20 17:33                                 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-24 15:07                                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-24 15:28                                     ` James Bottomley
2008-07-24 16:34                                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-24 16:52                                         ` James Bottomley
2008-07-24 21:49                                           ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-24 21:53                                             ` David Miller
2008-07-25  3:47                                               ` James Bottomley
2008-07-25  5:21                                                 ` David Miller
2008-07-25  2:26                                             ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-25  2:40                                             ` [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in blk_recalc_rq_segments John David Anglin
2008-07-20  5:54                         ` [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in blk_recalc_rq_segments about VMERGE David Miller
2008-07-15 14:50     ` James Bottomley
2008-07-15 15:24       ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-15 15:41         ` James Bottomley
2008-07-15 15:58           ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-15 16:07             ` James Bottomley
2008-07-15 16:20               ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-15 16:36                 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-15 21:50                   ` Mikulas Patocka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0807170746001.31185@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox